Literature DB >> 25368435

Optimizing Sedative Dose in Preterm Infants Undergoing Treatment for Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Peter F Thall1, Hoang Q Nguyen1, Sarah Zohar2, Pierre Maton3.   

Abstract

The Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation (INSURE) procedure is used worldwide to treat pre-term newborn infants suffering from respiratory distress syndrome, which is caused by an insufficient amount of the chemical surfactant in the lungs. With INSURE, the infant is intubated, surfactant is administered via the tube to the trachea, and at completion the infant is extubated. This improves the infant's ability to breathe and thus decreases the risk of long term neurological or motor disabilities. To perform the intubation safely, the newborn infant first must be sedated. Despite extensive experience with INSURE, there is no consensus on what sedative dose is best. This paper describes a Bayesian sequentially adaptive design for a multi-institution clinical trial to optimize the sedative dose given to pre-term infants undergoing the INSURE procedure. The design is based on three clinical outcomes, two efficacy and one adverse, using elicited numerical utilities of the eight possible elementary outcomes. A flexible Bayesian parametric trivariate dose-outcome model is assumed, with the prior derived from elicited mean outcome probabilities. Doses are chosen adaptively for successive cohorts of infants using posterior mean utilities, subject to safety and efficacy constraints. A computer simulation study of the design is presented.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive design; Bayesian design; Clinical Trial; Decision Theory; Dose-finding; Neonatal; Phase I–II trial; Surfactant; Utility

Year:  2014        PMID: 25368435      PMCID: PMC4215739          DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2014.904789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  24 in total

1.  Propofol-infusion syndrome in children.

Authors:  S D Murdoch; A T Cohen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-06-12       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Decision-theoretic designs for pre-phase II screening trials in oncology.

Authors:  N Stallard; P F Thall
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Determining the effective sample size of a parametric prior.

Authors:  Satoshi Morita; Peter F Thall; Peter Müller
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  A Bayesian approach to jointly modeling toxicity and biomarker expression in a phase I/II dose-finding trial.

Authors:  B Nebiyou Bekele; Yu Shen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  A strategy for dose-finding and safety monitoring based on efficacy and adverse outcomes in phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  P F Thall; K E Russell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Optimizing the concentration and bolus of a drug delivered by continuous infusion.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Aniko Szabo; Hoang Q Nguyen; Catherine M Amlie-Lefond; Osama O Zaidat
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Cerebral and systemic hemodynamic effects of intravenous bolus administration of propofol in neonates.

Authors:  Joke Vanderhaegen; Gunnar Naulaers; Sabine Van Huffel; Christine Vanhole; Karel Allegaert
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.035

8.  Clinical reliability and validity of the N-PASS: neonatal pain, agitation and sedation scale with prolonged pain.

Authors:  P Hummel; M Puchalski; S D Creech; M G Weiss
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.521

9.  The bivariate continual reassessment method. extending the CRM to phase I trials of two competing outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2002-06

Review 10.  Early surfactant administration with brief ventilation vs. selective surfactant and continued mechanical ventilation for preterm infants with or at risk for respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  T P Stevens; E W Harrington; M Blennow; R F Soll
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17
View more
  5 in total

1.  A Bayesian Phase I/II Trial Design for Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Suyu Liu; Beibei Guo; Ying Yuan
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  Parametric Dose Standardization for Optimizing Two-Agent Combinations in a Phase I-II Trial with Ordinal Outcomes.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Hoang Q Nguyen; Ralph G Zinner
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 1.864

3.  Unified approach for extrapolation and bridging of adult information in early-phase dose-finding paediatric studies.

Authors:  Caroline Petit; Adeline Samson; Satoshi Morita; Moreno Ursino; Jérémie Guedj; Vincent Jullien; Emmanuelle Comets; Sarah Zohar
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  TSNP: A two-stage nonparametric phase I/II clinical trial design for immunotherapy.

Authors:  Yan Han; Hao Liu; Sha Cao; Chi Zhang; Yong Zang
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 1.234

5.  SCI: A Bayesian adaptive phase I/II dose-finding design accounting for semi-competing risks outcomes for immunotherapy trials.

Authors:  Yifei Zhang; Beibei Guo; Sha Cao; Chi Zhang; Yong Zang
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 1.234

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.