Literature DB >> 25179541

Effective sample size for computing prior hyperparameters in Bayesian phase I-II dose-finding.

Peter F Thall1, Richard C Herrick2, Hoang Q Nguyen2, John J Venier2, J Clift Norris2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy-toxicity trade-off based design is a practical Bayesian phase I-II dose-finding methodology. Because the design's performance is very sensitive to prior hyperparameters and the shape of the target trade-off contour, specifying these two design elements properly is essential.
PURPOSE: The goals are to provide a method that uses elicited mean outcome probabilities to derive a prior that is neither overly informative nor overly disperse, and practical guidelines for specifying the target trade-off contour.
METHODS: A general algorithm is presented that determines prior hyperparameters using least squares penalized by effective sample size. Guidelines for specifying the trade-off contour are provided. These methods are illustrated by a clinical trial in advanced prostate cancer. A new version of the efficacy-toxicity program is provided for implementation.
RESULTS: Together, the algorithm and guidelines provide substantive improvements in the design's operating characteristics. LIMITATIONS: The method requires a substantial number of elicited values and design parameters, and computer simulations are required to obtain an acceptable design.
CONCLUSION: The two key improvements greatly enhance the efficacy-toxicity design's practical usefulness and are straightforward to implement using the updated computer program. The algorithm for determining prior hyperparameters to ensure a specified level of informativeness is general, and may be applied to models other than that underlying the efficacy-toxicity method.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive design; Bayesian design; clinical trial; dose-finding; phase I/II trial

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25179541      PMCID: PMC4229398          DOI: 10.1177/1740774514547397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  14 in total

1.  Recent developments in adaptive designs for Phase I/II dose-finding studies.

Authors:  Sarah Zohar; Sylvie Chevret
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.051

2.  Determining the effective sample size of a parametric prior.

Authors:  Satoshi Morita; Peter F Thall; Peter Müller
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Designs for phase II trials allowing for a trade-off between response and toxicity.

Authors:  M R Conaway; G R Petroni
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  A hierarchical Bayesian design for phase I trials of novel combinations of cancer therapeutic agents.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun; Shufang Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Simulation as a design tool for phase I/II clinical trials: an example from bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  T A Gooley; P J Martin; L D Fisher; M Pettinger
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1994-12

6.  Using Data Augmentation to Facilitate Conduct of Phase I-II Clinical Trials with Delayed Outcomes.

Authors:  Ick Hoon Jin; Suyu Liu; Peter F Thall; Ying Yuan
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  A strategy for dose-finding and safety monitoring based on efficacy and adverse outcomes in phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  P F Thall; K E Russell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Optimizing the concentration and bolus of a drug delivered by continuous infusion.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Aniko Szabo; Hoang Q Nguyen; Catherine M Amlie-Lefond; Osama O Zaidat
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity trade-offs.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; John D Cook
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  The bivariate continual reassessment method. extending the CRM to phase I trials of two competing outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2002-06
View more
  8 in total

1.  A hybrid phase I-II/III clinical trial design allowing dose re-optimization in phase III.

Authors:  Andrew G Chapple; Peter F Thall
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Statistical justification of expansion cohorts in phase 1 cancer trials.

Authors:  Ali A Mokdad; Xian-Jin Xie; Hong Zhu; David E Gerber; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  A simulation study of methods for selecting subgroup-specific doses in phase 1 trials.

Authors:  Satoshi Morita; Peter F Thall; Kentaro Takeda
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 1.894

4.  Lessons Learned From Implementing a Novel Bayesian Adaptive Dose-Finding Design in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca S S Tidwell; Peter F Thall; Ying Yuan
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-11-10

5.  Comparison of Phase I-II designs with parametric or semi-parametric models using two different risk-benefit trade-off criteria.

Authors:  Andrew G Chapple; Peter F Thall
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.261

6.  A phase I-II design based on periodic and continuous monitoring of disease status and the times to toxicity and death.

Authors:  Juhee Lee; Peter F Thall; Pavlos Msaouel
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Subgroup-specific dose finding for phase I-II trials using Bayesian clustering.

Authors:  Alexandra Curtis; Brian Smith; Andrew G Chapple
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Implementing the EffTox dose-finding design in the Matchpoint trial.

Authors:  Kristian Brock; Lucinda Billingham; Mhairi Copland; Shamyla Siddique; Mirjana Sirovica; Christina Yap
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.615

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.