Literature DB >> 16011680

A Bayesian approach to jointly modeling toxicity and biomarker expression in a phase I/II dose-finding trial.

B Nebiyou Bekele1, Yu Shen.   

Abstract

In this article, we propose a Bayesian approach to phase I/II dose-finding oncology trials by jointly modeling a binary toxicity outcome and a continuous biomarker expression outcome. We apply our method to a clinical trial of a new gene therapy for bladder cancer patients. In this trial, the biomarker expression indicates biological activity of the new therapy. For ethical reasons, the trial is conducted sequentially, with the dose for each successive patient chosen using both toxicity and activity data from patients previously treated in the trial. The modeling framework that we use naturally incorporates correlation between the binary toxicity and continuous activity outcome via a latent Gaussian variable. The dose-escalation/de-escalation decision rules are based on the posterior distributions of both toxicity and activity. A flexible state-space model is used to relate the activity outcome and dose. Extensive simulation studies show that the design reliably chooses the preferred dose using both toxicity and expression outcomes under various clinical scenarios.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16011680     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00314.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  32 in total

1.  Optimizing Sedative Dose in Preterm Infants Undergoing Treatment for Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Hoang Q Nguyen; Sarah Zohar; Pierre Maton
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  A robust Bayesian dose-finding design for phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  Suyu Liu; Valen E Johnson
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  An adaptive multi-stage phase I dose-finding design incorporating continuous efficacy and toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.

Authors:  Yu Du; Jun Yin; Daniel J Sargent; Sumithra J Mandrekar
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 1.051

4.  Dose finding for continuous and ordinal outcomes with a monotone objective function: a unified approach.

Authors:  Anastasia Ivanova; Se Hee Kim
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Innovative Clinical Trial Designs: Toward a 21st-Century Health Care System.

Authors:  Tze L Lai; Philip W Lavori
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2011-12

6.  Cumulative Toxicity in Targeted Therapies: What to Expect at the Recommended Phase II Dose.

Authors:  Maria-Athina Altzerinakou; Laurence Collette; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  A trivariate continual reassessment method for phase I/II trials of toxicity, efficacy, and surrogate efficacy.

Authors:  Wei Zhong; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Bradley P Carlin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Using Data Augmentation to Facilitate Conduct of Phase I-II Clinical Trials with Delayed Outcomes.

Authors:  Ick Hoon Jin; Suyu Liu; Peter F Thall; Ying Yuan
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 9.  Adaptive designs for randomized trials in public health.

Authors:  C Hendricks Brown; Thomas R Ten Have; Booil Jo; Getachew Dagne; Peter A Wyman; Bengt Muthén; Robert D Gibbons
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 21.981

10.  Dose--schedule finding in phase I/II clinical trials using a Bayesian isotonic transformation.

Authors:  Yisheng Li; B Nebiyou Bekele; Yuan Ji; John D Cook
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.