Literature DB >> 21361456

Language specificity in the perception of voiceless sibilant fricatives in Japanese and English: implications for cross-language differences in speech-sound development.

Fangfang Li1, Benjamin Munson, Jan Edwards, Kiyoko Yoneyama, Kathleen Hall.   

Abstract

Both English and Japanese have two voiceless sibilant fricatives, an anterior fricative /s/ contrasting with a more posterior fricative /∫/. When children acquire sibilant fricatives, English children typically substitute [s] for /∫/, whereas Japanese children typically substitute [∫] for /s/. This study examined English- and Japanese-speaking adults' perception of children's productions of voiceless sibilant fricatives to investigate whether the apparent asymmetry in the acquisition of voiceless sibilant fricatives reported previously in the two languages was due in part to how adults perceive children's speech. The results of this study show that adult speakers of English and Japanese weighed acoustic parameters differently when identifying fricatives produced by children and that these differences explain, in part, the apparent cross-language asymmetry in fricative acquisition. This study shows that generalizations about universal and language-specific patterns in speech-sound development cannot be determined without considering all sources of variation including speech perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21361456      PMCID: PMC3070995          DOI: 10.1121/1.3518716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives.

Authors:  A Jongman; R Wayland; S Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The Iowa Articulation Norms Project and its Nebraska replication.

Authors:  A B Smit; L Hand; J J Freilinger; J E Bernthal; A Bird
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1990-11

3.  Dental-to-velar perceptual assimilation: a cross-linguistic study of the perception of dental stop+/l/ clusters.

Authors:  Pierre A Hallé; Catherine T Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age.

Authors:  P K Kuhl; K A Williams; F Lacerda; K N Stevens; B Lindblom
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Statistical analysis of word-initial voiceless obstruents: preliminary data.

Authors:  K Forrest; G Weismer; P Milenkovic; R N Dougall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling.

Authors:  P Iverson; P K Kuhl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Acoustic and spectral characteristics of young children's fricative productions: a developmental perspective.

Authors:  Shawn L Nissen; Robert Allen Fox
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Acquisition of word-object associations by 14-month-old infants.

Authors:  J F Werker; L B Cohen; V L Lloyd; M Casasola; C L Stager
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  1998-11

9.  Contrast and covert contrast: The phonetic development of voiceless sibilant fricatives in English and Japanese toddlers.

Authors:  Fangfang Li; Jan Edwards; Mary E Beckman
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2009

10.  Children learn separate aspects of speech production at different rates: evidence from spectral moments.

Authors:  S Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  11 in total

1.  Language-specific developmental differences in speech production: a cross-language acoustic study.

Authors:  Fangfang Li
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2012-04-27

2.  Bias in the perception of phonetic detail in children's speech: A comparison of categorical and continuous rating scales.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Sarah K Schellinger; Jan Edwards
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 1.346

3.  Modifying speech to children based on their perceived phonetic accuracy.

Authors:  Hannah M Julien; Benjamin Munson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  An Exploration of Methods for Rating Children's Productions of Sibilant Fricatives.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Kari Urberg Carlson
Journal:  Speech Lang Hear       Date:  2016-02-05

5.  The Development of Voiceless Sibilant Fricatives in Putonghua-Speaking Children.

Authors:  Fangfang Li; Benjamin Munson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Gradient perception of children's productions of /s/ and /θ/: A comparative study of rating methods.

Authors:  Sarah K Schellinger; Benjamin Munson; Jan Edwards
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 1.346

7.  The role of experience in the perception of phonetic detail in children's speech: a comparison between speech-language pathologists and clinically untrained listeners.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Julie M Johnson; Jan Edwards
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  Frequency effects in phonological acquisition.

Authors:  Jan Edwards; Mary E Beckman; Benjamin Munson
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2015-03

9.  The Social Meaning of Contextualized Sibilant Alternations in Berlin German.

Authors:  Melanie Weirich; Stefanie Jannedy; Gediminas Schüppenhauer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-10-29

10.  Vowel Context Effect on the Perception of Stop Consonants in Malayalam and Its Role in Determining Syllable Frequency.

Authors:  Dhanya Mohan; Sandeep Maruthy
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2021-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.