Literature DB >> 27552446

Gradient perception of children's productions of /s/ and /θ/: A comparative study of rating methods.

Sarah K Schellinger1, Benjamin Munson1, Jan Edwards2.   

Abstract

Past studies have shown incontrovertible evidence for the existence of covert contrasts in children's speech, i.e. differences between target productions that are nonetheless transcribed with the same phonetic symbol. Moreover, there is evidence that these are relevant to forming prognoses and tracking progress in children with speech sound disorder. A challenge remains to determine the most efficient and reliable methods for assessing covert contrasts. This study investigates how readily listeners can identify covert contrasts in children's speech when using a continuous rating scale in the form of a visual analogue scale (VAS) to denote children's productions. Individual listeners' VAS responses were found to correlate statistically significantly with a variety of continuous measures of children's production accuracy, including judgements of binary accuracy pooled over a large set of listeners. These findings reinforce the growing body of evidence that VAS judgements are potentially useful clinical measures of covert contrast.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; children; covert contrast; fricative; speech perception

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27552446      PMCID: PMC5200952          DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2016.1205665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon        ISSN: 0269-9206            Impact factor:   1.346


  34 in total

1.  Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain.

Authors:  P E Bijur; W Silver; E J Gallagher
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives.

Authors:  A Jongman; R Wayland; S Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The Iowa Articulation Norms Project and its Nebraska replication.

Authors:  A B Smit; L Hand; J J Freilinger; J E Bernthal; A Bird
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1990-11

4.  The influence of multiple presentations on judgments of children's phonetic accuracy.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Kayla N Brinkman
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol.

Authors:  Gail B Kempster; Bruce R Gerratt; Katherine Verdolini Abbott; Julie Barkmeier-Kraemer; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Deconstructing phonetic transcription: covert contrast, perceptual bias, and an extraterrestrial view of Vox Humana.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Jan Edwards; Sarah K Schellinger; Mary E Beckman; Marie K Meyer
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.346

8.  The acquisition of the voicing contrast in English: study of voice onset time in word-initial stop consonants.

Authors:  M A Macken; D Barton
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  1980-02

9.  The role of experience in the perception of phonetic detail in children's speech: a comparison between speech-language pathologists and clinically untrained listeners.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Julie M Johnson; Jan Edwards
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 2.408

10.  Contrast and covert contrast: The phonetic development of voiceless sibilant fricatives in English and Japanese toddlers.

Authors:  Fangfang Li; Jan Edwards; Mary E Beckman
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2009
View more
  6 in total

1.  Evaluating the sources and functions of gradiency in phoneme categorization: An individual differences approach.

Authors:  Efthymia C Kapnoula; Matthew B Winn; Eun Jong Kong; Jan Edwards; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Methods for eliciting, annotating, and analyzing databases for child speech development.

Authors:  Mary E Beckman; Andrew R Plummer; Benjamin Munson; Patrick F Reidy
Journal:  Comput Speech Lang       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.899

3.  Selecting an acoustic correlate for automated measurement of American English rhotic production in children.

Authors:  Heather Campbell; Daphna Harel; Elaine Hitchcock; Tara McAllister Byun
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 2.484

4.  Individual Differences in the Development of Gendered Speech in Preschool Children: Evidence From a Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Natasha Lackas; Kiana Koeppe
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.674

5.  Does Early Phonetic Differentiation Predict Later Phonetic Development? Evidence From a Longitudinal Study of /ɹ/ Development in Preschool Children.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Mara K Logerquist; Hyuna Kim; Alisha Martell; Jan Edwards
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  What accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect?

Authors:  Violet A Brown; Maryam Hedayati; Annie Zanger; Sasha Mayn; Lucia Ray; Naseem Dillman-Hasso; Julia F Strand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.