Literature DB >> 22744140

Modifying speech to children based on their perceived phonetic accuracy.

Hannah M Julien1, Benjamin Munson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The authors examined the relationship between adults' perception of the accuracy of children's speech and acoustic detail in their subsequent productions to children.
METHOD: Twenty-two adults participated in a task in which they rated the accuracy of 2- and 3-year-old children's word-initial /s/ and /∫/ using a visual analog scale (VAS), then produced a token of the same word as if they were responding to the child whose speech they had just rated. Result The duration of adults' fricatives varied as a function of their perception of the accuracy of children's speech: Longer fricatives were produced following productions that they rated as inaccurate. This tendency to modify duration in response to perceived inaccurate tokens was mediated by measures of self-reported experience interacting with children. However, speakers did not increase the spectral distinctiveness of their fricatives following the perception of inaccurate tokens.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that adults modify temporal features of their speech in response to perceiving children's inaccurate productions. These longer fricatives are potentially both enhanced input to children and an error-corrective signal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22744140      PMCID: PMC3929121          DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0131)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  22 in total

1.  Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives.

Authors:  A Jongman; R Wayland; S Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: a functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech.

Authors:  Matthew Aylett; Alice Turk
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.500

3.  Speech to infants as hyperspeech: knowledge-driven processes in early word recognition.

Authors:  A Fernald
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2000 Apr-Dec       Impact factor: 1.759

4.  Fine-grained variation in caregivers' /s/ predicts their infants' /s/ category.

Authors:  Alejandrina Cristià
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Infant-directed speech supports phonetic category learning in English and Japanese.

Authors:  Janet F Werker; Ferran Pons; Christiane Dietrich; Sachiyo Kajikawa; Laurel Fais; Shigeaki Amano
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-05-16

Review 6.  Gradient change in the acquisition of phonology.

Authors:  Nigel Hewlett; Daphne Waters
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2004 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 1.346

Review 7.  Negative evidence in language acquisition.

Authors:  G F Marcus
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1993-01

8.  Unsupervised learning of vowel categories from infant-directed speech.

Authors:  Gautam K Vallabha; James L McClelland; Ferran Pons; Janet F Werker; Shigeaki Amano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Contrast and covert contrast: The phonetic development of voiceless sibilant fricatives in English and Japanese toddlers.

Authors:  Fangfang Li; Jan Edwards; Mary E Beckman
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2009

10.  Child-directed speech: relation to socioeconomic status, knowledge of child development and child vocabulary skill.

Authors:  Meredith L Rowe
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2008-02
View more
  12 in total

1.  Bias in the perception of phonetic detail in children's speech: A comparison of categorical and continuous rating scales.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Sarah K Schellinger; Jan Edwards
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 1.346

2.  Dynamic hyperarticulation of coda voicing contrasts.

Authors:  Scott Seyfarth; Esteban Buz; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Deriving gradient measures of child speech from crowdsourced ratings.

Authors:  Tara McAllister Byun; Daphna Harel; Peter F Halpin; Daniel Szeredi
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.288

4.  Intelligibility of clear speech: effect of instruction.

Authors:  Jennifer Lam; Kris Tjaden
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Gradient perception of children's productions of /s/ and /θ/: A comparative study of rating methods.

Authors:  Sarah K Schellinger; Benjamin Munson; Jan Edwards
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 1.346

6.  Online crowdsourcing for efficient rating of speech: a validation study.

Authors:  Tara McAllister Byun; Peter F Halpin; Daniel Szeredi
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 2.288

7.  Auditory feedback experience in the development of phonetic production: Evidence from preschoolers with cochlear implants and their normal-hearing peers.

Authors:  Margaret Cychosz; Benjamin Munson; Rochelle S Newman; Jan R Edwards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.482

8.  Covert contrast in velar fronting: An acoustic and ultrasound study.

Authors:  Tara McAllister Byun; Adam Buchwald; Ai Mizoguchi
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 1.346

9.  Finding the experts in the crowd: Validity and reliability of crowdsourced measures of children's gradient speech contrasts.

Authors:  Daphna Harel; Elaine Russo Hitchcock; Daniel Szeredi; José Ortiz; Tara McAllister Byun
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 1.346

10.  Infant directed speech and the development of speech perception: enhancing development or an unintended consequence?

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Kristine A Kovack-Lesh; Dresden Goodwin; William McEchron
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-08-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.