Literature DB >> 3611509

Growth of masking as a measure of response growth in hearing-impaired listeners.

P G Stelmachowicz, D E Lewis, L L Larson, W Jesteadt.   

Abstract

Growth-of-masking functions were obtained from 19 normal and 5 hearing-impaired listeners using a simultaneous-masking paradigm. When masker and probe frequency are identical, the slope of masking approximates 1.0 for both normal-hearing and impaired listeners. For masker frequencies less than or greater than probe frequency, the slopes for impaired listeners are shallower than those of normals. These findings are consistent with previously reported physiological data (single-fiber rate versus level and AP masking functions) for animals with induced cochlear lesions. Results are discussed in terms of a potential masking technique to estimate the growth of response in normal and impaired ears.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3611509     DOI: 10.1121/1.394752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  The role of suppression in the upward spread of masking.

Authors:  Ifat Yasin; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-12

2.  Influence of primary-level and primary-frequency ratios on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Cassie A Garner; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The role of suppression in psychophysical tone-on-tone masking.

Authors:  Joyce Rodríguez; Stephen T Neely; Harisadhan Patra; Judy Kopun; Walt Jesteadt; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of noise overexposure on tone detection in noise in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Samantha N Hauser; Jane A Burton; Evan T Mercer; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Comparing different estimates of cochlear compression in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Peninah S Rosengard; Andrew J Oxenham; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Growth of suppression using distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements in hearing-impaired humans.

Authors:  Cori Birkholz; Alyson Gruhlke; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Walt Jesteadt; Kendra K Schmid; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory filter shapes and high-frequency hearing in adults who have impaired speech in noise performance despite clinically normal audiograms.

Authors:  Rohima Badri; Jonathan H Siegel; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Dead regions in the cochlea: diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing AIDS.

Authors:  B C Moore
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-03

Review 9.  Development and current status of the "Cambridge" loudness models.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Discrimination of rippled-spectrum patterns in noise: A manifestation of compressive nonlinearity.

Authors:  Olga N Milekhina; Dmitry I Nechaev; Vladimir O Klishin; Alexander Ya Supin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.