Literature DB >> 1788029

Sources of auditory masking in infants: distraction effects.

L A Werner1, J Y Bargones.   

Abstract

Previous work has demonstrated that infants' thresholds for a pure tone are elevated by a masker more than would be predicted from their critical bandwidths. The present studies explored the nature of this additional masking. In Experiment 1, detection thresholds of 6-month-old infants and of adults for a 1-kHz tone were estimated under three conditions: in quiet, in the presence of a 4- to 10-kHz bandpass noise at 40 dB SPL, and in the presence of the same noise at 50 dB SPL. The noise was gated on at the beginning of each trial. Adult thresholds were the same in all three conditions, indicating that little or no sensory masking took place in the presence of the noise. Infant thresholds were about 10 dB higher in the presence of the noise. We term this effect distraction masking. In Experiment 2, the effect of gating the noise on at trial onset was examined. Thresholds for the same tone were estimated in quiet and in the presence of the band-pass noise at 40 dB SPL, but the noise was presented continuously during the session. Under these conditions, distraction masking was still observed for infants. These findings suggest that a masker can have nonsensory effects on infants' performance in a psychoacoustic task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1788029     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  15 in total

1.  Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns. II. Selective attention and learning under various levels of stimulus uncertainty.

Authors:  C S Watson; W J Kelly; H W Wroton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Developmental changes in masked thresholds.

Authors:  B A Schneider; S E Trehub; B A Morrongiello; L A Thorpe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Frequency selectivity and comodulation masking release in adults and in 6-year-old children.

Authors:  K Veloso; J W Hall; J H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1990-03

4.  Frequency resolution in children.

Authors:  P Allen; F Wightman; D Kistler; T Dolan
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1989-06

5.  Developmental changes in infants' sensitivity to octave-band noises.

Authors:  S E Trehub; B A Schneider; M Endman
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1980-04

6.  Size of critical band in infants, children, and adults.

Authors:  B A Schneider; B A Morrongiello; S E Trehub
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Level and age effects in infant frequency discrimination.

Authors:  L W Olsho; E G Koch; C F Halpin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory frequency resolution in human infancy.

Authors:  N B Spetner; L W Olsho
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1990-06

9.  Behavioral thresholds for tones during infancy.

Authors:  K M Berg; M C Smith
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1983-06

10.  Frequency and intensity discrimination in human infants and adults.

Authors:  J M Sinnott; R N Aslin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  23 in total

1.  Excitation-based and informational masking of a tonal signal in a four-tone masker.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Jack J Hitchens; Emily Buss; Donna L Neff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Adults, but not children, benefit from a pretrial signal cue in a random-frequency, two-tone masker.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Informational masking release in children and adults.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A new approach to sound source segregation.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Ching-Ju Liu; Christophe N J Stoelinga
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  A detection-theoretic framework for modeling informational masking.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; An-Chieh Chang; Jacob Stamas; Lynn Gilbertson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A method for evaluating the relation between sound source segregation and masking.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Ching-Ju Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Target enhancement and noise cancellation in the identification of a rudimentary sound source in noise.

Authors:  Robert A Lutfi; Ching-Ju Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Computational modeling of individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-30

9.  Effect of signal-temporal uncertainty in children and adults: tone detection in noise or a random-frequency masker.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The Effect of Remote Masking on the Reception of Speech by Young School-Age Children.

Authors:  Carla L Youngdahl; Eric W Healy; Sarah E Yoho; Frédéric Apoux; Rachael Frush Holt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.