Literature DB >> 21358554

Brainstem correlates of behavioral and compositional preferences of musical harmony.

Gavin M Bidelman1, Ananthanarayan Krishnan.   

Abstract

Certain chords are preferred by listeners behaviorally and also occur with higher regularity in musical composition. Event-related potentials index the perceived consonance (i.e., pleasantness) of musical pitch relationships providing a cortical neural correlate for such behavioral preferences. Here, we show correlates of these harmonic preferences exist at subcortical stages of audition. Brainstem frequency-following responses were measured in response to four prototypical musical triads. Pitch salience computed from frequency-following responses correctly predicted the ordering of triadic harmony stipulated by music theory (i.e., major >minor >>diminished >augmented). Moreover, neural response magnitudes showed high correspondence with listeners' perceptual ratings of the same chords. Results suggest that preattentive stages of pitch processing may contribute to perceptual judgments of musical harmony.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21358554      PMCID: PMC3057421          DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328344a689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  14 in total

Review 1.  Neurobiological foundations for the theory of harmony in western tonal music.

Authors:  M J Tramo; P A Cariani; B Delgutte; L D Braida
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Enhanced brainstem encoding predicts musicians' perceptual advantages with pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Neural correlates of the Pythagorean ratio rules.

Authors:  Alexander H Foss; Eric L Altschuler; Karin H James
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2007-10-08       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Cross-domain effects of music and language experience on the representation of pitch in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Putative measure of peripheral and brainstem frequency-following in humans.

Authors:  G C Galbraith; M R Threadgill; J Hemsley; K Salour; N Songdej; J Ton; L Cheung
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2000-10-06       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Individual differences reveal the basis of consonance.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andriana J Lehr; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Effects of reverberation on brainstem representation of speech in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  A neurophysiological study into the foundations of tonal harmony.

Authors:  Elika Bergelson; William J Idsardi
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  A biological rationale for musical scales.

Authors:  Kamraan Z Gill; Dale Purves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Pitch representations in the auditory nerve: two concurrent complex tones.

Authors:  Erik Larsen; Leonardo Cedolin; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  17 in total

1.  Musicians and tone-language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  LANGUAGE EXPERIENCE SHAPES PROCESSING OF PITCH RELEVANT INFORMATION IN THE HUMAN BRAINSTEM AND AUDITORY CORTEX: ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Acoust Aust       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.500

3.  Language-experience plasticity in neural representation of changes in pitch salience.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Chandan H Suresh
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 4.  Experience-dependent plasticity in pitch encoding: from brainstem to auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson Thomas Gandour; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Auditory-nerve responses predict pitch attributes related to musical consonance-dissonance for normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Cortical hemisphere preference and brainstem ear asymmetry reflect experience-dependent functional modulation of pitch.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.781

7.  (Dis-)Harmony in movement: effects of musical dissonance on movement timing and form.

Authors:  Naeem Komeilipoor; Matthew W M Rodger; Cathy M Craig; Paola Cesari
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  On the Relevance of Natural Stimuli for the Study of Brainstem Correlates: The Example of Consonance Perception.

Authors:  Marion Cousineau; Gavin M Bidelman; Isabelle Peretz; Alexandre Lehmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The role of the auditory brainstem in processing musically relevant pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-13

10.  Phase locked neural activity in the human brainstem predicts preference for musical consonance.

Authors:  Oliver Bones; Kathryn Hopkins; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.