Literature DB >> 20691672

Effects of reverberation on brainstem representation of speech in musicians and non-musicians.

Gavin M Bidelman1, Ananthanarayan Krishnan.   

Abstract

Perceptual and neurophysiological enhancements in linguistic processing in musicians suggest that domain specific experience may enhance neural resources recruited for language specific behaviors. In everyday situations, listeners are faced with extracting speech signals in degraded listening conditions. Here, we examine whether musical training provides resilience to the degradative effects of reverberation on subcortical representations of pitch and formant-related harmonic information of speech. Brainstem frequency-following responses (FFRs) were recorded from musicians and non-musician controls in response to the vowel /i/ in four different levels of reverberation and analyzed based on their spectro-temporal composition. For both groups, reverberation had little effect on the neural encoding of pitch but significantly degraded neural encoding of formant-related harmonics (i.e., vowel quality) suggesting a differential impact on the source-filter components of speech. However, in quiet and across nearly all reverberation conditions, musicians showed more robust responses than non-musicians. Neurophysiologic results were confirmed behaviorally by comparing brainstem spectral magnitudes with perceptual measures of fundamental (F0) and first formant (F1) frequency difference limens (DLs). For both types of discrimination, musicians obtained DLs which were 2-4 times better than non-musicians. Results suggest that musicians' enhanced neural encoding of acoustic features, an experience-dependent effect, is more resistant to reverberation degradation which may explain their enhanced perceptual ability on behaviorally relevant speech and/or music tasks in adverse listening conditions.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20691672      PMCID: PMC2939203          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.07.100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  101 in total

1.  Stronger bilateral efferent influences on cochlear biomechanical activity in musicians than in non-musicians.

Authors:  X Perrot; C Micheyl; S Khalfa; L Collet
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1999-03-12       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Effects of reverberation on spatial, prosodic, and vocal-tract size cues to selective attention.

Authors:  C J Darwin; R W Hukin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The fate of sounds in conductors' brains: an ERP study.

Authors:  Wido Nager; Christine Kohlmetz; Eckart Altenmüller; Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-06

4.  Superior voice timbre processing in musicians.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Chartrand; Pascal Belin
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Individual differences in second-language proficiency: does musical ability matter?

Authors:  L Robert Slevc; Akira Miyake
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-08

6.  Corticofugal modulation of initial sound processing in the brain.

Authors:  Feng Luo; Qianzhou Wang; Alireza Kashani; Jun Yan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Perception of pitch and timbre by musically trained and untrained listeners.

Authors:  M A Pitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Neural correlates of consonance, dissonance, and the hierarchy of musical pitch in the human brainstem.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Experience-dependent neural representation of dynamic pitch in the brainstem.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour; Gavin M Bidelman; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 10.  Experience-induced malleability in neural encoding of pitch, timbre, and timing.

Authors:  Nina Kraus; Erika Skoe; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Richard Ashley
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.691

View more
  77 in total

1.  Enhanced brainstem encoding predicts musicians' perceptual advantages with pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Musicians and tone-language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Effects of Aging on the Encoding of Dynamic and Static Components of Speech.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Kimberly Jenkins; Rachel Lieberman; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Training to improve hearing speech in noise: biological mechanisms.

Authors:  Judy H Song; Erika Skoe; Karen Banai; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Listening to the brainstem: musicianship enhances intelligibility of subcortical representations for speech.

Authors:  Michael W Weiss; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Inherent auditory skills rather than formal music training shape the neural encoding of speech.

Authors:  Kelsey Mankel; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Tone language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in brainstem and auditory cortex is maintained under reverberation.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  The ability to move to a beat is linked to the consistency of neural responses to sound.

Authors:  Adam Tierney; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Auditory Training: Evidence for Neural Plasticity in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Perspect Hear Hear Disord Res Res Diagn       Date:  2013-05

10.  Cortical and subcortical processing of short duration speech stimuli in trained rock musicians: a pilot study.

Authors:  Prawin Kumar; Sam Publius Anil; Vibhu Grover; Himanshu Kumar Sanju; Sachchidanand Sinha
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.