Literature DB >> 21350829

Prosthesis-patient mismatch: an update.

Jean G Dumesnil1, Philippe Pibarot.   

Abstract

Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) is present when the effective orifice area of the inserted prosthetic valve is too small in relation to body size. Its main hemodynamic consequence is to generate higher than expected gradients through normally functioning prosthetic valves. The purpose of this review is to present an update on the present state of knowledge with regard to diagnosis, prognosis, and prevention of PPM. PPM is a frequent occurrence (20% to 70% of aortic valve replacements) that has been shown to be associated with worse hemodynamics, less regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, more cardiac events, and lower survival. Moreover, as opposed to most other risk factors, PPM can largely be prevented by using a prospective strategy at the time of operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21350829     DOI: 10.1007/s11886-011-0172-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3782            Impact factor:   2.931


  49 in total

1.  Validation and applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  J G Dumesnil; G N Honos; M Lemieux; J Beauchemin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Echo/Doppler evaluation of hemodynamics after aortic valve replacement: principles of interrogation and evaluation of high gradients.

Authors:  David S Bach
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-03

3.  Impact of the improvement of valve area achieved with aortic valve replacement on the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with pure aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Giordano Tasca; Federico Brunelli; Marco Cirillo; Margherita Dalla Tomba; Zen Mhagna; Giovanni Troise; Eugenio Quaini
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Impact of prosthesis-patient size on functional recovery after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Colleen Gorman Koch; Farah Khandwala; Fawzy G Estafanous; Floyd D Loop; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on pulmonary arterial pressure after mitral valve replacement.

Authors:  Mingzhou Li; Jean G Dumesnil; Patrick Mathieu; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of percutaneous and surgical bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Marie-Annick Clavel; John G Webb; Philippe Pibarot; Lukas Altwegg; Eric Dumont; Chris Thompson; Robert De Larochellière; Daniel Doyle; Jean-Bernard Masson; Sebastien Bergeron; Olivier F Bertrand; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  Is patient-prosthesis mismatch an independent risk factor for early and mid-term overall mortality in adult patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?

Authors:  Stefano Urso; Rafael Sadaba; Gonzalo Aldamiz-Echevarria
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-06-04

8.  Influence of prosthesis-patient mismatch on exercise-induced arrhythmias: a further aspect after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Vito Antonio Mannacio; Vincenzo De Amicis; Luigi Di Tommaso; Francesco Iorio; Carlo Vosa
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Acquired von Willebrand syndrome in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  André Vincentelli; Sophie Susen; Thierry Le Tourneau; Isabelle Six; Olivier Fabre; Francis Juthier; Anne Bauters; Christophe Decoene; Jenny Goudemand; Alain Prat; Brigitte Jude
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival.

Authors:  Zeineb Hachicha; Jean G Dumesnil; Peter Bogaty; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-05-28       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  22 in total

1.  Impact of New York Heart Association classification, advanced age and patient-prosthesis mismatch on outcomes in aortic valve replacement surgery.

Authors:  Alex Zapolanski; Andrew W C Mak; Giovanni Ferrari; Christopher Johnson; Richard E Shaw; Mariano E Brizzio; Jason S Sperling; Juan B Grau
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-06-04

2.  Apicoaortic conduit: a simple solution to a difficult problem.

Authors:  Salil V Deo; Soon J Park
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Patient-prosthesis mismatch after transapical aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Marian Kukucka; Miralem Pasic; Stephan Dreysse; Semih Buz; Thorsten Drews; Alexander Mladenow; Helmut Habazettl; Hermann Kuppe; Axel Unbehaun; Roland Hetzer
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-07

4.  Incidence and sequelae of prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter versus surgical valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: a PARTNER trial cohort--a analysis.

Authors:  Philippe Pibarot; Neil J Weissman; William J Stewart; Rebecca T Hahn; Brian R Lindman; Thomas McAndrew; Susheel K Kodali; Michael J Mack; Vinod H Thourani; D Craig Miller; Lars G Svensson; Howard C Herrmann; Craig R Smith; Josep Rodés-Cabau; John Webb; Scott Lim; Ke Xu; Irene Hueter; Pamela S Douglas; Martin B Leon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  On the Mechanics of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Lakshmi P Dasi; Hoda Hatoum; Arash Kheradvar; Ramin Zareian; S Hamed Alavi; Wei Sun; Caitlin Martin; Thuy Pham; Qian Wang; Prem A Midha; Vrishank Raghav; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 6.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Small Anatomy: Patient Selection and Technical Challenges.

Authors:  Makoto Nakashima; Yusuke Watanabe
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2018-05

7.  Mini-aortic valve replacements are not associated with an increased incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch: a propensity-scored analysis.

Authors:  J Trent Magruder; Joshua C Grimm; Arman Kilic; Todd Crawford; John V Conte; Duke E Cameron; Ashish S Shah
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-12-19

Review 8.  Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Abdellaziz Dahou; Haïfa Mahjoub; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-11

9.  Stented bioprostheses in aortic position.

Authors:  J Cremer; J Schöttler; R Petzina; G Hoffmann
Journal:  HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth       Date:  2012

10.  Comparison of patient-prothesis mismatch after surgical aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Bilge Ecemiş Yılmaz; Mehmet Karacalılar; Burak Ersoy; Burak Onan
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 0.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.