Literature DB >> 17533183

Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival.

Zeineb Hachicha1, Jean G Dumesnil, Peter Bogaty, Philippe Pibarot.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies and current clinical observations suggest that some patients with severe aortic stenosis on the basis of aortic valve area may paradoxically have a relatively low gradient despite the presence of a preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction. The objective of the present study was to document the prevalence, potential mechanisms, and clinical relevance of this phenomenon. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We retrospectively studied the clinical and Doppler echocardiographic data of 512 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis (indexed aortic valve area < or = 0.6 cm2 x m(-2)) and preserved LV ejection fraction (> or = 50%). Of these patients, 331 (65%) had normal LV flow output defined as a stroke volume index > 35 mL x m2, and 181 (35%) had paradoxically low-flow output defined as stroke volume index < or = 35 mL x m(-2). When compared with normal flow patients, low-flow patients had a higher prevalence of female gender (P<0.05), a lower transvalvular gradient (32+/-17 versus 40+/-15 mm Hg; P<0.001), a lower LV diastolic volume index (52+/-12 versus 59+/-13 mL x m(-2); P<0.001), lower LV ejection fraction (62+/-8% versus 68+/-7%; P<0.001), a higher level of LV global afterload reflected by a higher valvulo-arterial impedance (5.3+/-1.3 versus 4.1+/-0.7 mm Hg x mL(-1) x m(-2); P<0.001) and a lower overall 3-year survival (76% versus 86%; P=0.006). Only age (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.08; P=0.025), valvulo-arterial impedance > 5.5 mm Hg x mL(-1) x m(-2) (hazard ratio, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.7; P=0.017), and medical treatment (hazard ratio, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.8 to 6.7; P=0.0003) were independently associated with increased mortality.
CONCLUSION: Patients with severe aortic stenosis may have low transvalvular flow and low gradients despite normal LV ejection fraction. A comprehensive evaluation shows that this pattern is in fact consistent with a more advanced stage of the disease and has a poorer prognosis. Such findings are clinically relevant because this condition may often be misdiagnosed, which leads to a neglect and/or an underestimation of symptoms and an inappropriate delay of aortic valve replacement surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17533183     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  161 in total

1.  Heart failure with a normal ejection fraction: treatments for a complex syndrome?

Authors:  Samuel Bernard; Mathew S Maurer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2012-08

2.  Myocardial fibrosis in severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Wendy Tsang; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Pathophysiology of Aortic Valve Stenosis: Is It Both Fibrocalcific and Sex Specific?

Authors:  Yoginee Sritharen; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Hartzell V Schaff; Grace Casaclang-Verzosa; Jordan D Miller
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-05

4.  Transvalvular Flow Rate Determines Prognostic Value of Aortic Valve Area in Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Mayooran Namasivayam; Wei He; Timothy W Churchill; Romain Capoulade; Shiying Liu; Hang Lee; Jacqueline S Danik; Michael H Picard; Philippe Pibarot; Robert A Levine; Judy Hung
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Workup and Management of Patients With Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Mohamed-Salah Annabi; Marine Clisson; Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-05-02

6.  Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics and predictors of survival.

Authors:  Mackram F Eleid; Paul Sorajja; Hector I Michelena; Joseph F Malouf; Christopher G Scott; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Perioperative risk of major non-cardiac surgery in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a reappraisal in contemporary practice.

Authors:  Teruko Tashiro; Sorin V Pislaru; Jodi M Blustin; Vuyisile T Nkomo; Martin D Abel; Christopher G Scott; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 8.  Challenges and opportunities in improving left ventricular remodelling and clinical outcome following surgical and trans-catheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Xu Yu Jin; Mario Petrou; Jiang Ting Hu; Ed D Nicol; John R Pepper
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 9.  The role of echocardiography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Toshinari Onishi; Kaoruko Sengoku; Yasuhiro Ichibori; Isamu Mizote; Koichi Maeda; Toru Kuratani; Yoshiki Sawa; Yasushi Sakata
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-02

Review 10.  Low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Marie-Annick Clavel; Julien Magne; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.