Literature DB >> 19497953

Is patient-prosthesis mismatch an independent risk factor for early and mid-term overall mortality in adult patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?

Stefano Urso1, Rafael Sadaba, Gonzalo Aldamiz-Echevarria.   

Abstract

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: is patient-prosthesis mismatch an independent risk factor for 30-day and mid-term overall mortality in adult patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR)? Altogether, almost 400 papers were found using the reported search, of which 22 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. The majority of the selected articles have focused their analysis on moderate mismatch defined mostly by the presence of an indexed effective orifice area (IEOA)<or=0.85 cm(2)/m(2). In fact, because of the low incidence of patients with severe mismatch, these were often grouped for the statistical analysis with patients with moderate mismatch. Only six studies have analyzed the specific condition of severe mismatch (IEOA<0.65 cm(2)/m(2)). Three studies used the IEOA or indexed geometric orifice area (IGOA) as a continuous variable. We conclude that there is no strong evidence that moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) (indexed IEOA<or=0.85 and >0.65 cm(2)/m(2)) is an independent risk factor for 30-day or mid-term overall mortality for adult patients undergoing AVR. An exception could be represented by patients with poor ejection fraction, a condition that can make moderate mismatch a predictor of overall mortality after AVR. On the other hand, severe mismatch is a predictor of overall 30-day or mid-term mortality for patients undergoing AVR independently from the presence of poor ejection fraction. In conclusion, our review suggests that the condition of severe PPM should be always avoided, while the presence of moderate mismatch could be tolerated in patients with normal ejection fraction without any impact on overall survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19497953     DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2009.207597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  15 in total

1.  Impact of New York Heart Association classification, advanced age and patient-prosthesis mismatch on outcomes in aortic valve replacement surgery.

Authors:  Alex Zapolanski; Andrew W C Mak; Giovanni Ferrari; Christopher Johnson; Richard E Shaw; Mariano E Brizzio; Jason S Sperling; Juan B Grau
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-06-04

2.  Long-term results after aortic root replacement using self-assembled valve composite grafts in patients with small aortic annulus.

Authors:  Paul P Urbanski; Witold Dinstak; Wilko Rents; Nicolas Heinz; Anno Diegeler
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-10-30

Review 3.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch: an update.

Authors:  Jean G Dumesnil; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Early and late outcomes of AVR with aortic annular enlargement in octogenarian.

Authors:  Yuki Okamoto; Kazuo Yamamoto; Tsutomu Sugimoto; Shinpei Yoshii
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-05-14

Review 5.  Diagnostic evaluation of left-sided prosthetic heart valve dysfunction.

Authors:  Jesse Habets; Ricardo P Budde; Petr Symersky; Renee B van den Brink; Bas A de Mol; Willem P Mali; Lex A van Herwerden; Steven A Chamuleau
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 6.  Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Abdellaziz Dahou; Haïfa Mahjoub; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-11

7.  [Imaging following valve replacement].

Authors:  D Dabir; E Arroyo-Ucar; E A Ucar; E Nagel
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 8.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Kentaro Honda; Yoshitaka Okamura
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-10-17

9.  Incidence and Impact of Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch in Isolated Aortic Valve Surgery.

Authors:  Selman Dumani; Ermal Likaj; Andi Kacani; Laureta Dibra; Elizana Petrela; Vera Beca; Ali Refatllari
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-15

10.  Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on early and late mortality after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Bart M Koene; Mohamed A Soliman Hamad; Wobbe Bouma; Massimo A Mariani; Kathinka C Peels; Jan-Melle van Dantzig; Albert H van Straten
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.