Mingzhou Li1, Jean G Dumesnil, Patrick Mathieu, Philippe Pibarot. 1. Research Group in Valvular Heart Diseases, Research Center of Laval Hospital/Quebec Heart Institute, Laval University, 2725 Chemin Saint-Foy, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada G1V 4G5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) on pulmonary arterial (PA) pressure after mitral valve replacement (MVR). BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a serious complication of mitral valve disease, and it is a major risk factor for poor outcome after MVR. We hypothesized that valve PPM might be a determinant of PA hypertension after MVR. METHODS: Systolic PA pressure was measured by Doppler echocardiography in 56 patients with normally functioning mitral prosthetic valves. Mitral valve effective orifice area (EOA) was determined by the continuity equation and indexed for body surface area. RESULTS: Thirty patients (54%) had PA hypertension defined as systolic PA pressure >40 mm Hg, whereas 40 patients (71%) had PPM defined as an indexed EOA < or =1.2 cm(2)/m(2). There was a significant correlation (r = 0.64) between systolic PA pressure and indexed EOA. The average systolic PA pressure and prevalence of PA hypertension were 34 +/- 8 mm Hg and 19% in patients with no PPM versus 46 +/- 8 mm Hg and 68% in patients with PPM (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the indexed EOA was by far the strongest predictor of systolic PA pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent PA hypertension is frequent after MVR and strongly associated with the presence of PPM. The clinical implications of these findings are important given that PPM can largely be avoided by using a simple prospective strategy at the time of operation.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) on pulmonary arterial (PA) pressure after mitral valve replacement (MVR). BACKGROUND:Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a serious complication of mitral valve disease, and it is a major risk factor for poor outcome after MVR. We hypothesized that valve PPM might be a determinant of PAhypertension after MVR. METHODS: Systolic PA pressure was measured by Doppler echocardiography in 56 patients with normally functioning mitral prosthetic valves. Mitral valve effective orifice area (EOA) was determined by the continuity equation and indexed for body surface area. RESULTS: Thirty patients (54%) had PAhypertension defined as systolic PA pressure >40 mm Hg, whereas 40 patients (71%) had PPM defined as an indexed EOA < or =1.2 cm(2)/m(2). There was a significant correlation (r = 0.64) between systolic PA pressure and indexed EOA. The average systolic PA pressure and prevalence of PAhypertension were 34 +/- 8 mm Hg and 19% in patients with no PPM versus 46 +/- 8 mm Hg and 68% in patients with PPM (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the indexed EOA was by far the strongest predictor of systolic PA pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent PAhypertension is frequent after MVR and strongly associated with the presence of PPM. The clinical implications of these findings are important given that PPM can largely be avoided by using a simple prospective strategy at the time of operation.
Authors: Philippe B Bertrand; Frederik H Verbrugge; David Verhaert; Christophe J P Smeets; Lars Grieten; Wilfried Mullens; Herbert Gutermann; Robert A Dion; Robert A Levine; Pieter M Vandervoort Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-02-10 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Abdulhameed Aziz; Jennifer S Lawton; Hersh S Maniar; Michael K Pasque; Ralph J Damiano; Marc R Moon Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Denis Bouchard; Frédéric Vanden Eynden; Philippe Demers; Louis P Perrault; Michel Carrier; Raymond Cartier; Arsène J Basmadjian; Michel Pellerin Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Sem Briongos Figuero; José Luis Moya Mur; Alberto García-Lledó; Tomasa Centella; Luisa Salido; Álvaro Aceña Navarro; Ana García Martín; Ignacio García-Andrade; Enrique Oliva; José Luis Zamorano Journal: Heart Vessels Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 2.037