Literature DB >> 21318084

Bayesian Models and Decision Algorithms for Complex Early Phase Clinical Trials.

Peter F Thall1.   

Abstract

An early phase clinical trial is the first step in evaluating the effects in humans of a potential new anti-disease agent or combination of agents. Usually called "phase I" or "phase I/II" trials, these experiments typically have the nominal scientific goal of determining an acceptable dose, most often based on adverse event probabilities. This arose from a tradition of phase I trials to evaluate cytotoxic agents for treating cancer, although some methods may be applied in other medical settings, such as treatment of stroke or immunological diseases. Most modern statistical designs for early phase trials include model-based, outcome-adaptive decision rules that choose doses for successive patient cohorts based on data from previous patients in the trial. Such designs have seen limited use in clinical practice, however, due to their complexity, the requirement of intensive, computer-based data monitoring, and the medical community's resistance to change. Still, many actual applications of model-based outcome-adaptive designs have been remarkably successful in terms of both patient benefit and scientific outcome. In this paper, I will review several Bayesian early phase trial designs that were tailored to accommodate specific complexities of the treatment regime and patient outcomes in particular clinical settings.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21318084      PMCID: PMC3035990          DOI: 10.1214/09-STS315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Sci        ISSN: 0883-4237            Impact factor:   2.901


  26 in total

1.  Bayesian optimal designs for Phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Linda M Haines; Inna Perevozskaya; William F Rosenberger
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Accrual strategies for phase I trials with delayed patient outcome.

Authors:  P F Thall; J J Lee; C H Tseng; E H Estey
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Busulfan systemic exposure relative to regimen-related toxicity and acute graft-versus-host disease: defining a therapeutic window for i.v. BuCy2 in chronic myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  Borje S Andersson; Peter F Thall; Timothy Madden; Daniel Couriel; Xuemei Wang; Hai T Tran; Paolo Anderlini; Marcos de Lima; James Gajewski; Richard E Champlin
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  A strategy for dose-finding and safety monitoring based on efficacy and adverse outcomes in phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  P F Thall; K E Russell
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002.

Authors:  Elizabeth Horstmann; Mary S McCabe; Louise Grochow; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Larry Rubinstein; Troy Budd; Dale Shoemaker; Ezekiel J Emanuel; Christine Grady
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Individualized dosing of amonafide based on a pharmacodynamic model incorporating acetylator phenotype and gender.

Authors:  M J Ratain; R Mick; L Janisch; F Berezin; R L Schilsky; N J Vogelzang; M Kut
Journal:  Pharmacogenetics       Date:  1996-02

7.  Patient-specific dose finding based on bivariate outcomes and covariates.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Hoang Q Nguyen; Elihu H Estey
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Practical model-based dose finding in early-phase clinical trials: optimizing tissue plasminogen activator dose for treatment of ischemic stroke in children.

Authors:  Harry T Whelan; John D Cook; Catherine M Amlie-Lefond; Collin A Hovinga; Anthony K Chan; Rebecca N Ichord; Gabrielle A Deveber; Peter F Thall
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Ethics, data-dependent designs, and the strategy of clinical trials: time to start learning-as-we-go?

Authors:  C R Palmer
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  Monitoring late-onset toxicities in phase I trials using predicted risks.

Authors:  B Nebiyou Bekele; Yuan Ji; Yu Shen; Peter F Thall
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 5.899

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of early phase clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  Nam Q Bui; Shivaani Kummar
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  Using joint utilities of the times to response and toxicity to adaptively optimize schedule-dose regimes.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Hoang Q Nguyen; Thomas M Braun; Muzaffar H Qazilbash
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Stochastic Approximation and Modern Model-based Designs for Dose-Finding Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Ying Kuen Cheung
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.901

4.  A curve free Bayesian decision-theoretic design for phase Ia/Ib trials considering both safety and efficacy outcomes.

Authors:  Shenghua Fan; Bee Leng Lee; Ying Lu
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2020-03-26

5.  Adaptive Clinical Trials: Overview of Early-Phase Designs and Challenges.

Authors:  Olga Marchenko; Valerii Fedorov; J Jack Lee; Christy Nolan; José Pinheiro
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.778

Review 6.  Adaptive designs for dual-agent phase I dose-escalation studies.

Authors:  Jennifer A Harrington; Graham M Wheeler; Michael J Sweeting; Adrian P Mander; Duncan I Jodrell
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Implementing the EffTox dose-finding design in the Matchpoint trial.

Authors:  Kristian Brock; Lucinda Billingham; Mhairi Copland; Shamyla Siddique; Mirjana Sirovica; Christina Yap
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.615

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.