Literature DB >> 8845865

Individualized dosing of amonafide based on a pharmacodynamic model incorporating acetylator phenotype and gender.

M J Ratain1, R Mick, L Janisch, F Berezin, R L Schilsky, N J Vogelzang, M Kut.   

Abstract

Amonafide is extensively metabolized, including conversion by N-acetylation to an active metabolite. Our previous studies have shown that fast acetylators of amonafide have increased toxicity, and we have recommended doses of 250 and 375 mg m-2 day-1 for 5 days, for fast and slow acetylators, respectively. Despite phenotype-specific dosing, significant variability in leukopenia persisted. The goal of this study was to construct and validate a pharmacodynamic model-based dosing strategy for amonafide, to try to further decrease inter-patient variability in leukopenia. The model was based on a training data set of 41 patients previously treated with amonafide. The first cycle nadir WBC was modelled as a function of dose, acetylator phenotype and baseline patient factors. This model was validated prospectively on patients similar to those in our previous studies. Based on the training data set, the optimal model was defined by three factors: acetylator phenotype, gender, and pretreatment WBC. Using this model and a target WBC nadir of 1700 microliters-1, six dosing strata were prospectively evaluated. A total of 24 fast acetylators received either 238 or 276 mg m-2 day-1 and 20 slow acetylators received between 345 and 485 mg m-2 day-1. The mean (+/- SE) error (deviation from target nadir) was 430 (+/- 240) cells microliters-1. Submaximal treatment (yielding grade 0-1 leukopenia) was limited to 20% of patients, while 55% experienced grade 2-3 toxicity. A complex dosing strategy for amonafide is feasible, employing prospective acetylator phenotyping, model-guided dosing, and adaptive control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8845865     DOI: 10.1097/00008571-199602000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenetics        ISSN: 0960-314X


  8 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacogenetics: a tool for individualizing antineoplastic therapy.

Authors:  F Innocenti; L Iyer; M J Ratain
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  How important are gender differences in pharmacokinetics?

Authors:  Bernd Meibohm; Ingrid Beierle; Hartmut Derendorf
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Bayesian Models and Decision Algorithms for Complex Early Phase Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Peter F Thall
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.901

Review 4.  Chemotherapy individualization.

Authors:  Gareth J Veal; Sally A Coulthard; Alan V Boddy
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 5.  PharmGKB summary: very important pharmacogene information for N-acetyltransferase 2.

Authors:  Ellen M McDonagh; Sotiria Boukouvala; Eleni Aklillu; David W Hein; Russ B Altman; Teri E Klein
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 6.  Predictive biomarkers in precision medicine and drug development against lung cancer.

Authors:  Bingliang Fang; Reza J Mehran; John V Heymach; Stephen G Swisher
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2015-07-02

7.  Adaptive Estimation of Personalized Maximum Tolerated Dose in Cancer Phase I Clinical Trials Based on All Toxicities and Individual Genomic Profile.

Authors:  Zhengjia Chen; Zheng Li; Run Zhuang; Ying Yuan; Michael Kutner; Taofeek Owonikoko; Walter J Curran; Jeanne Kowalski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Arylamine N-acetyltransferase acetylation polymorphisms: paradigm for pharmacogenomic-guided therapy- a focused review.

Authors:  David W Hein; Lori M Millner
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 4.481

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.