Literature DB >> 15745980

Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002.

Elizabeth Horstmann1, Mary S McCabe, Louise Grochow, Seiichiro Yamamoto, Larry Rubinstein, Troy Budd, Dale Shoemaker, Ezekiel J Emanuel, Christine Grady.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous reviews of phase 1 oncology trials reported a rate of response to treatment of 4 to 6 percent and a toxicity-related death rate of 0.5 percent. These results may not reflect the rates in current phase 1 oncology trials.
METHODS: We reviewed all nonpediatric phase 1 oncology trials sponsored by the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program at the National Cancer Institute between 1991 and 2002. We report the rates of response to treatment, of stable disease, of grade 4 toxic events, and of treatment-related deaths.
RESULTS: We analyzed 460 trials involving 11,935 participants, all of whom were assessed for toxicity and 10,402 of whom were assessed for a response to therapy. The overall response rate (i.e., for both complete and partial responses) was 10.6 percent, with considerable variation among trials. "Classic" phase 1 trials of single investigational chemotherapeutic agents represented only 20 percent of the trials and had a response rate of 4.4 percent. Studies that included at least one anticancer agent approved by the Food and Drug Administration constituted 46.3 percent of the trials and had a response rate of 17.8. An additional 34.1 percent of participants had stable disease or a less-than-partial response. The overall rate of death due to toxic events was 0.49 percent. Of 3465 participants for whom data on patient-specific grade 4 toxic events were available, 14.3 percent had had at least one episode of grade 4 toxic events.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall response rates among phase 1 oncology trials are higher than previously reported, although they have not changed for classic phase 1 trials, and toxicity-related death rates have remained stable. Rates of response and toxicity vary, however, among the various types of phase 1 oncology trials. Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15745980     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa042220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  152 in total

Review 1.  Molecular prescreening to select patient population in early clinical trials.

Authors:  Jordi Rodón; Cristina Saura; Rodrigo Dienstmann; Ana Vivancos; Santiago Ramón y Cajal; José Baselga; Josep Tabernero
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Novel therapies, high-risk pediatric research, and the prospect of benefit: learning from the ethical disagreements.

Authors:  Inmaculada de Melo-Martín; Dolan Sondhi; Ronald G Crystal
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 3.  Current challenges for the early clinical development of anticancer drugs in the era of molecularly targeted agents.

Authors:  Christophe Le Tourneau; Véronique Diéras; Patricia Tresca; Wulfran Cacheux; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 4.  Therapeutic cancer vaccines: are we there yet?

Authors:  Christopher A Klebanoff; Nicolas Acquavella; Zhiya Yu; Nicholas P Restifo
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 5.  Beyond cancer vaccines: a reason for future optimism with immunomodulatory therapy.

Authors:  Michael Postow; Margaret K Callahan; Jedd D Wolchok
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 6.  Analysis of Drug Development Paradigms for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Authors:  Denis L Jardim; Débora de Melo Gagliato; Francis J Giles; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Clinical outcomes and survival of advanced renal cancer patients in phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Laeeq Malik; Helen Parsons; Devalingam Mahalingam; Benjamin Ehler; Martin Goros; Alex Mejia; Andrew Brenner; John Sarantopoulos
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.872

8.  Research participants' high expectations of benefit in early-phase oncology trials: are we asking the right question?

Authors:  Kevin P Weinfurt; Damon M Seils; Li Lin; Daniel P Sulmasy; Alan B Astrow; Herbert I Hurwitz; Roger B Cohen; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Phase I study of anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody bevacizumab and histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid in patients with advanced cancers.

Authors:  Jennifer J Wheler; Filip Janku; Gerald S Falchook; Tiffiny L Jackson; Siqing Fu; Aung Naing; Apostalia M Tsimberidou; Stacy L Moulder; David S Hong; Hui Yang; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Johnique T Atkins; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Clinical trial participation as part of end-of-life cancer care: associations with medical care and quality of life near death.

Authors:  Andrea C Enzinger; Baohui Zhang; Jane C Weeks; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.