Literature DB >> 24016201

Cortical potentials in an auditory oddball task reflect individual differences in working memory capacity.

Kate A Yurgil1, Edward J Golob.   

Abstract

This study determined whether auditory cortical responses associated with mechanisms of attention vary with individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) and perceptual load. The operation span test defined subjects with low versus high WMC, who then discriminated target/nontarget tones while EEG was recorded. Infrequent white noise distracters were presented at midline or ±90° locations, and perceptual load was manipulated by varying nontarget frequency. Amplitude of the N100 to distracters was negatively correlated with WMC. Relative to targets, only high WMC subjects showed attenuated N100 amplitudes to nontargets. In the higher WMC group, increased perceptual load was associated with decreased P3a amplitudes to distracters and longer-lasting negative slow wave to nontargets. Results show that auditory cortical processing is associated with multiple facets of attention related to WMC and possibly higher-level cognition.
Copyright © 2013 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; EEG; N100; P300; P3a; Perceptual load

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24016201      PMCID: PMC4082305          DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  89 in total

1.  Individual differences in working memory capacity predict action monitoring and the error-related negativity.

Authors:  A Eve Miller; Jason M Watson; David L Strayer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Working memory capacity is related to variations in the magnitude of an electrophysiological marker of recollection.

Authors:  R L Elward; E L Wilding
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Short-term memory storage and retention: an event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  D S Ruchkin; R Johnson; H Canoune; W Ritter
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-11

Review 4.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

5.  Working memory capacity and visual-verbal cognitive load modulate auditory-sensory gating in the brainstem: toward a unified view of attention.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; Stefan Stenfelt; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  A triarchic model of P300 amplitude.

Authors:  R Johnson
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; R F Hink; V L Schwent; T W Picton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Facts and fiction about memory aging: a quantitative integration of research findings.

Authors:  P Verhaeghen; A Marcoen; L Goossens
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1993-07

Review 9.  The emergence of cognitive hearing science.

Authors:  Stig Arlinger; Thomas Lunner; Björn Lyxell; M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2009-10

10.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and divided attention in dichotic listening.

Authors:  Gregory J H Colflesh; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08
View more
  8 in total

1.  Attentional responses on an auditory oddball predict false memory susceptibility.

Authors:  John E Kiat; Dianna Long; Robert F Belli
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Auditory spatial attention capture, disengagement, and response selection in normal aging.

Authors:  Edward J Golob; Jeffrey R Mock
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Rapid cortical dynamics associated with auditory spatial attention gradients.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Mock; Michael J Seay; Danielle R Charney; John L Holmes; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Individual differences in distractibility: An update and a model.

Authors:  Patrik Sörqvist; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Psych J       Date:  2014-03-10

5.  Surprise response as a probe for compressed memory states.

Authors:  Hadar Levi-Aharoni; Oren Shriki; Naftali Tishby
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  The Effects of Working Memory Load on Auditory Distraction in Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

Authors:  Rina Blomberg; Andrea Johansson Capusan; Carine Signoret; Henrik Danielsson; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Toward a taxonomic model of attention in effortful listening.

Authors:  Daniel J Strauss; Alexander L Francis
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 8.  Music Training, Working Memory, and Neural Oscillations: A Review.

Authors:  Kate A Yurgil; Miguel A Velasquez; Jenna L Winston; Noah B Reichman; Paul J Colombo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-02-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.