Literature DB >> 16382240

Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects.

Yaoda Xu1, Marvin M Chun.   

Abstract

Using visual information to guide behaviour requires storage in a temporary buffer, known as visual short-term memory (VSTM), that sustains attended information across saccades and other visual interruptions. There is growing debate on whether VSTM capacity is limited to a fixed number of objects or whether it is variable. Here we report four experiments using functional magnetic resonance imaging that resolve this controversy by dissociating the representation capacities of the parietal and occipital cortices. Whereas representations in the inferior intra-parietal sulcus (IPS) are fixed to about four objects at different spatial locations regardless of object complexity, those in the superior IPS and the lateral occipital complex are variable, tracking the number of objects held in VSTM, and representing fewer than four objects as their complexity increases. These neural response patterns were observed during both VSTM encoding and maintenance. Thus, multiple systems act together to support VSTM: whereas the inferior IPS maintains spatial attention over a fixed number of objects at different spatial locations, the superior IPS and the lateral occipital complex encode and maintain a variable subset of the attended objects, depending on their complexity. VSTM capacity is therefore determined both by a fixed number of objects and by object complexity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16382240     DOI: 10.1038/nature04262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  353 in total

1.  Reduced capacity but spared precision and maintenance of working memory representations in schizophrenia.

Authors:  James M Gold; Britta Hahn; Wei Wei Zhang; Benjamin M Robinson; Emily S Kappenman; Valerie M Beck; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2010-06

Review 2.  The focus of attention as observed in visual working memory tasks: making sense of competing claims.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Small Subitizing Range in People with Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Kirsten O'Hearn; James E Hoffman; Barbara Landau
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011-03

4.  Does high memory load kick task-irrelevant information out of visual working memory?

Authors:  Jun Yin; Jifan Zhou; Haokui Xu; Junying Liang; Zaifeng Gao; Mowei Shen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

5.  A central capacity limit to the simultaneous storage of visual and auditory arrays in working memory.

Authors:  J Scott Saults; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11

6.  Moving to higher ground: The dynamic field theory and the dynamics of visual cognition.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; John P Spencer; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  New Ideas Psychol       Date:  2008-08

7.  Stimulus-specific delay activity in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  John T Serences; Edward F Ester; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-01-08

8.  A visual short-term memory advantage for objects of expertise.

Authors:  Kim M Curby; Kuba Glazek; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Dynamic range of frontoparietal functional modulation is associated with working memory capacity limitations in older adults.

Authors:  Jonathan G Hakun; Nathan F Johnson
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Evidence for a fixed capacity limit in attending multiple locations.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Keisuke Fukuda; Lisa M May; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.