Literature DB >> 24128148

Attentional bias for nondrug reward is magnified in addiction.

Brian A Anderson1, Monica L Faulkner2, Jessica J Rilee2, Steven Yantis3, Cherie L Marvel2.   

Abstract

Attentional biases for drug-related stimuli play a prominent role in addiction, predicting treatment outcomes. Attentional biases also develop for stimuli that have been paired with nondrug rewards in adults without a history of addiction, the magnitude of which is predicted by visual working-memory capacity and impulsiveness. We tested the hypothesis that addiction is associated with an increased attentional bias for nondrug (monetary) reward relative to that of healthy controls, and that this bias is related to working-memory impairments and increased impulsiveness. Seventeen patients receiving methadone-maintenance treatment for opioid dependence and 17 healthy controls participated. Impulsiveness was measured using the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11; Patton, Stanford, & Barratt, 1995), visual working-memory capacity was measured as the ability to recognize briefly presented color stimuli, and attentional bias was measured as the magnitude of response time slowing caused by irrelevant but previously reward-associated distractors in a visual-search task. The results showed that attention was biased toward the distractors across all participants, replicating previous findings. It is important to note, this bias was significantly greater in the patients than in the controls and was negatively correlated with visual working-memory capacity. Patients were also significantly more impulsive than controls as a group. Our findings demonstrate that patients in treatment for addiction experience greater difficulty ignoring stimuli associated with nondrug reward. This nonspecific reward-related bias could mediate the distracting quality of drug-related stimuli previously observed in addiction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24128148      PMCID: PMC3934504          DOI: 10.1037/a0034575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1064-1297            Impact factor:   3.157


  47 in total

1.  Attentional bias associated with alcohol cues: differences between heavy and occasional social drinkers.

Authors:  J M Townshend; T Duka
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Test-retest reliability of a lifetime drug use questionnaire.

Authors:  Christoph Czermak; Michael Lehofer; Peter Gasser-Steiner; Sandra Ettinger; Leonidas Lemonis; Alfred Rohrhofer; Thomas Legl; Peter M Liebmann
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  Learning to attend and to ignore is a matter of gains and losses.

Authors:  Chiara Della Libera; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-05-05

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  Relative potency of levo-alpha-acetylmethadol and methadone in humans under acute dosing conditions.

Authors:  T Eissenberg; M L Stitzer; G E Bigelow; A R Buchhalter; S L Walsh
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.030

6.  Working memory ability predicts trajectories of early alcohol use in adolescents: the mediational role of impulsivity.

Authors:  Atika Khurana; Dan Romer; Laura M Betancourt; Nancy L Brodsky; Joan M Giannetta; Hallam Hurt
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  In monkeys making value-based decisions, LIP neurons encode cue salience and not action value.

Authors:  Marvin L Leathers; Carl R Olson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Concurrent validation of the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) and single-item indices against the Clinical Institute Narcotic Assessment (CINA) opioid withdrawal instrument.

Authors:  D Andrew Tompkins; George E Bigelow; Joseph A Harrison; Rolley E Johnson; Paul J Fudala; Eric C Strain
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 9.  A systematic review of the relationship between high school dropout and substance use.

Authors:  Loraine Townsend; Alan J Flisher; Gary King
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-12

10.  Acute alcohol effects on attentional bias are mediated by subcortical areas associated with arousal and salience attribution.

Authors:  Kyriaki Nikolaou; Matt Field; Hugo Critchley; Theodora Duka
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 7.853

View more
  42 in total

1.  Reward, attention, and HIV-related risk in HIV+ individuals.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Sharif I Kronemer; Jessica J Rilee; Ned Sacktor; Cherie L Marvel
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 5.996

2.  The Attribution of Value-Based Attentional Priority in Individuals with Depressive Symptoms.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Stephanie L Leal; Michelle G Hall; Michael A Yassa; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014

3.  The role of reward prediction in the control of attention.

Authors:  Anthony W Sali; Brian A Anderson; Steven Yantis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Mechanisms of habitual approach: Failure to suppress irrelevant responses evoked by previously reward-associated stimuli.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Charles L Folk; Rebecca Garrison; Leeland Rogers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-04-07

5.  Value-based attentional capture influences context-dependent decision-making.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Napat Rangsipat; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Measuring attention to reward as an individual trait: the value-driven attention questionnaire (VDAQ).

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Haena Kim; Mark K Britton; Andy Jeesu Kim
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-06-12

7.  Awareness is necessary for attentional biases by location-reward association.

Authors:  Chisato Mine; Takemasa Yokoyama; Yuji Takeda
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Value-Driven Attentional Capture is Modulated by Spatial Context.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2015

9.  Reward Anticipation Is Differentially Modulated by Varenicline and Nicotine in Smokers.

Authors:  John R Fedota; Matthew T Sutherland; Betty Jo Salmeron; Thomas J Ross; L Elliot Hong; Elliot A Stein
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Value-driven attentional priority signals in human basal ganglia and visual cortex.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Patryk A Laurent; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.