Literature DB >> 23066799

Prolonged disengagement from attentional capture in normal aging.

Nathan Cashdollar1, Keisuke Fukuda, Angelika Bocklage, Sara Aurtenetxe, Edward K Vogel, Adam Gazzaley.   

Abstract

Older adults are more vulnerable to a negative impact of irrelevant information on cognitive performance. We used a psychophysical approach to evaluate which aspects of distraction are altered in aging: susceptibility for attention to be captured by a distractor, or the timing of disengagement from processing a distractor. We found that younger and older adults were equally susceptible to a detrimental influence of attentional capture on target detection in the initial moments after distractor presentation, but older adults exhibited a longer time window for the negative effects of capture to resolve. As was recently shown in younger adults, the timing of disengagement from capture correlated with individual differences in visual working memory capacity in the older cohort. These results suggest that the larger impact by distraction on perceptual abilities in normal aging is not the result of a greater susceptibility to attentional capture by distraction, but rather the prolonged processing of distractors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23066799      PMCID: PMC3586289          DOI: 10.1037/a0029899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  42 in total

1.  Age differences in the control of looking behavior: do you know where your eyes have been?

Authors:  A F Kramer; S Hahn; D E Irwin; J Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-05

2.  Attentional capture and aging: implications for visual search performance and oculomotor control.

Authors:  A F Kramer; S Hahn; D E Irwin; J Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1999-03

3.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  Trail Making Test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education.

Authors:  Tom N Tombaugh
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.813

5.  Age differences in visual statistical learning.

Authors:  Karen L Campbell; Shira Zimerman; M Karl Healey; Michelle M S Lee; Lynn Hasher
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-01-16

6.  Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Jeffrey W Cooney; Jesse Rissman; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-11       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Cognitive and attentional changes with age: evidence from attentional blink deficits.

Authors:  James B Maciokas; Michael A Crognale
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.645

9.  Adult age differences in the time course of inhibition of return.

Authors:  Alan D Castel; Alison L Chasteen; Charles T Scialfa; Jay Pratt
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Brian Barton; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-07
View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-21

2.  On the time course of attentional focusing in older adults.

Authors:  Lisa N Jefferies; Alexa B Roggeveen; James T Enns; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-15

3.  Gestalt grouping cues can improve filtering performance in visual working memory.

Authors:  Ayala S Allon; Gili Vixman; Roy Luria
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-05-29

4.  Predictive cues and age-related declines in working memory performance.

Authors:  Namita A Padgaonkar; Theodore P Zanto; Jacob Bollinger; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 5.  Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences.

Authors:  Steven J Luck; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  Cognitive aging: is there a dark side to environmental support?

Authors:  Ulman Lindenberger; Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Age mediation of frontoparietal activation during visual feature search.

Authors:  David J Madden; Emily L Parks; Simon W Davis; Michele T Diaz; Guy G Potter; Ying-hui Chou; Nan-kuei Chen; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Testing the differential effects of symptom management interventions in cancer.

Authors:  Alla Sikorskii; Charles W Given; Azfar-E-Alam Siddiqi; Victoria Champion; Ruth McCorkle; Sandra L Spoelstra; Barbara A Given
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Auditory spatial attention capture, disengagement, and response selection in normal aging.

Authors:  Edward J Golob; Jeffrey R Mock
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  A cognitive framework for understanding and improving interference resolution in the brain.

Authors:  Jyoti Mishra; Joaquin A Anguera; David A Ziegler; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.453

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.