Literature DB >> 23179127

Does femoral rotation influence anteroposterior alpha angle, lateral center-edge angle, and medial proximal femoral angle? A pilot study.

Shafagh Monazzam1, James D Bomar, Mandar Agashe, Harish S Hosalkar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Femoral rotation on AP radiographs affects several parameters used to assess morphologic features of the proximal femur but its effect on femoroacetabular impingement parameters remains unknown. QUESTION/PURPOSES: We therefore evaluated and characterized the potential effect of femoral rotation on (1) AP alpha angle, (2) lateral-center edge angle (LCEA), and (3) medial proximal femoral angle (MPFA) on AP hip radiographs.
METHODS: We took seven AP hip radiographs at intervals of successive femoral rotation on a single dry, cadaveric specimen: 60°, 40°, and 20° internal rotation; 0° neutral/anatomic rotation; and 20°, 40°, and 50° external rotation. The AP alpha angle, LCEA, and MPFA were measured on all radiographs by two independent evaluators.
RESULTS: Within the range of femoral rotation studied, the AP alpha angle ranged from 39° to 62°, the LCEA from 25° to 35°, and the MPFA from 70° to 115°. MPFA and AP alpha angle showed a linear relationship with femoral rotation. Each additional degree of internal rotation produced a reciprocal reduction of the MPFA by 0.36° and the AP alpha angle by 0.18° and vice versa in external rotation. The LCEA, especially within the internal rotation range, showed minimal variation.
CONCLUSIONS: These changes in radiographic parameters emphasize the importance of femoral rotation and patient positioning. We recommend radiographs be evaluated for excessive femoral rotation or nonstandardized positioning before interpretation for diagnostic and treatment implications. It may be prudent to repeat radiographs in these circumstances or, when standardized positioning is not feasible, proceed toward advance imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23179127      PMCID: PMC3613525          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2708-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  40 in total

Review 1.  The place of magnetic resonance imaging in health care.

Authors:  D Hailey; D Marshall
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  CT imaging, then and now: a 30-year review of the economics of computed tomography.

Authors:  Wayne T Stockburger
Journal:  Radiol Manage       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec

Review 3.  Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Klaus A Siebenrock; Suzanne E Anderson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Michael Leunig; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Predictors of progression of osteoarthritis in femoroacetabular impingement: a radiological study with a minimum of ten years follow-up.

Authors:  N V Bardakos; R N Villar
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-02

6.  Radiographic analysis of femoroacetabular impingement with Hip2Norm-reliable and validated.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Sapan Mistry; Simon D Steppacher; Stephan Reichenbach; Frank Langlotz; Klaus A Siebenrock; Guoyan Zheng
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; John C Carlisle; Paul E Beaulé; Young-Jo Kim; Robert T Trousdale; Rafael J Sierra; Michael Leunig; Perry L Schoenecker; Michael B Millis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Proximal femoral anatomy in the normal human population.

Authors:  Paul A Toogood; Anthony Skalak; Daniel R Cooperman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The prevalence of cam-type deformity of the hip joint: a survey of 4151 subjects of the Copenhagen Osteoarthritis Study.

Authors:  K K Gosvig; S Jacobsen; S Sonne-Holm; P Gebuhr
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 10.  The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept.

Authors:  Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig; Katharina Leunig-Ganz; William H Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  3 in total

1.  Femoro-acetabular impingement: anatomic study of reliability and accuracy of alpha angle and offset ratio on fifty consecutive peri-operatively resected femoral heads.

Authors:  Štěpán Magersky; Adam Král; Radovan Kubeš
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Hip shape is symmetric, non-dependent on limb dominance and gender-specific: implications for femoroacetabular impingement. A 3D CT analysis in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Vasco V Mascarenhas; Paulo Rego; Pedro Dantas; Miguel Castro; Lennart Jans; Rui M Marques; Nélia Gouveia; Francisco Soldado; Olufemi R Ayeni; José G Consciência
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Can hip arthroscopy in the presence of arthritis delay the need for hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  A Viswanath; V Khanduja
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2017-02-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.