Literature DB >> 23354528

Radiographic measurements of hip dysplasia at skeletal maturity--new reference intervals based on 2,038 19-year-old Norwegians.

Lene Bjerke Laborie1, Ingvild Øvstebø Engesæter, Trude Gundersen Lehmann, Francesco Sera, Carol Dezateux, Lars Birger Engesæter, Karen Rosendahl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Normative references for radiographic measurements commonly used in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip at skeletal maturity are incomplete. The present study therefore aimed to establish new gender-specific standards for measurements reflecting the acetabular morphology, namely Sharp's angle, the acetabular roof angle of Tönnis (AA) and the acetabular depth-width ratio (ADR), and measurements reflecting the position of the femoral head related to the acetabulum, namely the center-edge (CE) angle of Wiberg, the refined CE angle of Ogata, and the femoral head extrusion index (FHEI). The joint space width (JSW) is also reported.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The population-based 1989 Bergen Birth Cohort (n = 3,935) was invited at age 19 years to a follow-up during 2007-09, of which 2,038 (52 %) attended. A standardized antero-posterior radiograph was assessed. The normative references are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and 2.5-97.5 percentiles with 95 % confidence intervals.
RESULTS: A total of 2,011 (841 males, 1,170 females, mean age 18.6 (SD 0.6)) radiographs were analyzed. Sharp's angle was 38.8° ± 3.5° in males and 40.7° ± 3.5° in females, with 97.5 percentiles of 46° and 47°, respectively. The CE angle was 32.1° ± 6.1° in males and 31.0° ± 6.1° in females, with 2.5 percentiles of 21° and 20°, respectively. The FHEI was 86.0 % ± 6.3 % in males and 85.6 % ± 6.6 % in females, with 2.5 percentiles of 74° and 73°, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Updated gender-specific reference ranges for radiographic measurements commonly used for hip dysplasia at skeletal maturity are reported, similar to or slightly wider than those described in the literature. Statistically significant gender differences have been confirmed for most of the measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23354528     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-013-1574-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  75 in total

Review 1.  Calculating reference intervals for laboratory measurements.

Authors:  E M Wright; P Royston
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Predictors of progression of osteoarthritis in femoroacetabular impingement: a radiological study with a minimum of ten years follow-up.

Authors:  N V Bardakos; R N Villar
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-02

3.  A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; John C Carlisle; Paul E Beaulé; Young-Jo Kim; Robert T Trousdale; Rafael J Sierra; Michael Leunig; Perry L Schoenecker; Michael B Millis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in the neonate: the effect on treatment rate and prevalence of late cases.

Authors:  K Rosendahl; T Markestad; R T Lie
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 5.  Surgical treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip in adults: II. Arthroplasty options.

Authors:  Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Daniel J Berry; Robert T Trousdale; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Computed tomography measurement of acetabular dimensions: normal values for correction of dysplasia.

Authors:  Kaj Tallroth; Jyri Lepistö
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Adult hip dysplasia and osteoarthritis. Studies in radiology and clinical epidemiology.

Authors:  Steffen Jacobsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Suppl       Date:  2006-12

8.  The CE angle of normal hips.

Authors:  N Fredensborg
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1976-08

9.  Neonatal hip instability: results and experiences from ten years of screening with the anterior-dynamic ultrasound method.

Authors:  J E Andersson
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.299

Review 10.  Hip disease in the young, active patient: evaluation and nonarthroplasty surgical options.

Authors:  Rafael J Sierra; Robert T Trousdale; Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.020

View more
  12 in total

1.  The Lisbon Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement imaging-part 2: general issues, parameters, and reporting.

Authors:  Vasco V Mascarenhas; Miguel O Castro; P Diana Afonso; Paulo Rego; Michael Dienst; Reto Sutter; Florian Schmaranzer; Luca Sconfienza; Ara Kassarjian; Olufemi R Ayeni; Paul E Beaulé; Pedro Dantas; Radhesh Lalam; Marc-André Weber; Filip M Vanhoenacker; Tobias Johannes Dietrich; Lennart Jans; Philip Robinson; Apostolos H Karantanas; Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska; Suzanne Anderson; Iris Noebauer-Huhmann; Oliver Marin-Peña; Diego Collado; Marc Tey-Pons; Ehrenfried Schmaranzer; Mario Padron; Josef Kramer; Patrick O Zingg; Michel De Maeseneer; Eva Llopis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Do Radiographic Parameters of Dysplasia Improve to Normal Ranges After Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy?

Authors:  Eduardo N Novais; Stephen Duncan; Jeffrey Nepple; Gail Pashos; Perry L Schoenecker; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  What Are the Reference Values and Associated Factors for Center-edge Angle and Alpha Angle? A Population-based Study.

Authors:  Cornelius Sebastian Fischer; Jens-Peter Kühn; Till Ittermann; Carsten-Oliver Schmidt; Denis Gümbel; Richard Kasch; Matthias Frank; René Laqua; Peter Hinz; Jörn Lange
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Characteristics associated with joint replacement in early symptomatic knee or hip osteoarthritis: 6-year results from a nationwide prospective cohort study (CHECK).

Authors:  Alex N Bastick; Jurgen Damen; Rintje Agricola; Reinoud W Brouwer; Patrick Je Bindels; Sita Ma Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  A comparative radiographic morphometric analysis to assess the normal radiological morphology of the adult hip in indian population.

Authors:  Balaji Zacharia; K Mohammed Fawas
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-10-17

6.  Superiority of the modified Tönnis angle over the Tönnis angle in the radiographic diagnosis of acetabular dysplasia.

Authors:  Liangguo Fa; Qing Wang; Xiangxing Ma
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Comment on Mittal et al: Defining the lateral edge of the femoroacetabular articulation: correlation analysis between radiographs and computed tomography.

Authors:  N Egund
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.548

8.  Value of susceptibility-weighted imaging for the assessment of angle measurements reflecting hip morphology.

Authors:  Sarah M Böker; Lisa C Adams; Ute Lina Fahlenkamp; Gerd Diederichs; Bernd Hamm; Marcus R Makowski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Initial Results of an Acetabular Center Axis Registration Technique in Navigated Hip Arthroplasty with Deformed Acetabular Rims.

Authors:  Hiroshi Wada; Hajime Mishima; Tomohiro Yoshizawa; Hisashi Sugaya; Tomofumi Nishino; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-03-22

10.  Novel Radiographic Indexes for Elbow Stability Assessment: Part A-Cadaveric Validation.

Authors:  Francesco Luceri; Davide Cucchi; Paolo Angelo Arrigoni; Pietro Simone Randelli; Enrico Rosagrata; Carlo Eugenio Zaolino; Marco Viganò; Laura de Girolamo; Andrea Zagarella; Michele Catapano; Mauro Battista Gallazzi
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.