Literature DB >> 29110047

Hip shape is symmetric, non-dependent on limb dominance and gender-specific: implications for femoroacetabular impingement. A 3D CT analysis in asymptomatic subjects.

Vasco V Mascarenhas1, Paulo Rego2, Pedro Dantas3, Miguel Castro4, Lennart Jans5, Rui M Marques6, Nélia Gouveia6, Francisco Soldado7, Olufemi R Ayeni8, José G Consciência6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the reference intervals (RefInt) of the quantitative morphometric parameters of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in asymptomatic hips with computed tomography (CT) and determine their dependence on age, side, limb dominance and sex.
METHODS: We prospectively included 590 patients and evaluated 1111 hips with semi-automated CT analysis. We calculated overall, side- and sex-specific parameters for imaging signs of cam [omega and alpha angle (α°)] and pincer-type morphology [acetabular version (ACvers), lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA) and cranio-caudal coverage].
RESULTS: Hip shape was symmetrical and did not depend on limb dominance. The 95% RefInt limits were sex-different for all cam-type parameters and extended beyond current abnormal thresholds. Specifically, the upper limits of RefInt for α° at 12:00, 1:30 and 3:00 o'clock positions were 56°, 70° and 58°, respectively, and 45° for LCEA. Acetabular morphology varied between age groups, with a trend toward an LCEA/ACvers increase over time.
CONCLUSION: Our morphometric measurements can be used to estimate normal hip morphology in asymptomatic individuals. Notably they extended beyond current thresholds used for FAI imaging diagnosis, which was most pronounced for cam-type parameters. We suggest the need to reassess α° RefInt and consider a 60° threshold for the 12:00/3:00 positions and 65-70° for other antero-superior positions. KEY POINTS: • Hip shape is symmetrical regardless of limb dominance. • Pincer/cam morphology is frequent in asymptomatic subjects (20 and 71%, respectively). • LCEA and acetabular version increases with age (5-7° between opposite age groups). • Femoral morphology is stable after physeal closure (in the absence of pathology). • Alpha and omega angle thresholds should be set according to sex.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femoroacetabular impingement; Hip; Multidetector computed tomography; Normal value; Reference value

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29110047     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5072-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  74 in total

1.  Analysis of acetabular version in the native hip: comparison between 2D axial CT and 3D CT measurements.

Authors:  Wael Dandachli; Saif Ul Islam; Richard Tippett; Margaret A Hall-Craggs; Johan D Witt
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  What causes cam deformity and femoroacetabular impingement: still too many questions to provide clear answers.

Authors:  Rintje Agricola; Harrie Weinans
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Variations in acetabular anatomy with reference to total hip replacement.

Authors:  P E Murtha; M A Hafez; B Jaramaz; A M DiGioia
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-03

4.  Predictors of progression of osteoarthritis in femoroacetabular impingement: a radiological study with a minimum of ten years follow-up.

Authors:  N V Bardakos; R N Villar
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-02

5.  What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage?

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Markus S Hanke; Guoyan Zheng; Simon D Steppacher; Klaus A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Validation of a standardized mapping system of the hip joint for radial MRA sequencing.

Authors:  Frank M Klenke; Daniel B Hoffmann; Brian J Cross; Klaus A Siebenrock
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Outcomes for Hip Arthroscopy According to Sex and Age: A Comparative Matched-Group Analysis.

Authors:  Rachel M Frank; Simon Lee; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Michael J Salata; Richard C Mather; Shane J Nho
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Are normal hips being labeled as pathologic? A CT-based method for defining normal acetabular coverage.

Authors:  Christopher M Larson; Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry; Bryan T Kelly; J W Thomas Byrd; Jérôme Tonetti; Stephane Lavallee; Laurence Chabanas; Guillaume Barrier; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Prevalence of radiographic markers of femoroacetabular impingement in asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Rodrigo Benedet Scheidt; Carlos Roberto Galia; Cristiano Valter Diesel; Ricardo Rosito; Carlos Alberto de Souza Macedo
Journal:  Rev Col Bras Cir       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

10.  Sex differences of hip morphology in young adults with hip pain and labral tears.

Authors:  Iftach Hetsroni; Katrina Dela Torre; Gavin Duke; Stephen Lyman; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  7 in total

1.  The Lisbon Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement imaging-part 2: general issues, parameters, and reporting.

Authors:  Vasco V Mascarenhas; Miguel O Castro; P Diana Afonso; Paulo Rego; Michael Dienst; Reto Sutter; Florian Schmaranzer; Luca Sconfienza; Ara Kassarjian; Olufemi R Ayeni; Paul E Beaulé; Pedro Dantas; Radhesh Lalam; Marc-André Weber; Filip M Vanhoenacker; Tobias Johannes Dietrich; Lennart Jans; Philip Robinson; Apostolos H Karantanas; Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska; Suzanne Anderson; Iris Noebauer-Huhmann; Oliver Marin-Peña; Diego Collado; Marc Tey-Pons; Ehrenfried Schmaranzer; Mario Padron; Josef Kramer; Patrick O Zingg; Michel De Maeseneer; Eva Llopis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The Lisbon Agreement on Femoroacetabular Impingement Imaging-part 3: imaging techniques.

Authors:  Miguel O Castro; Vasco V Mascarenhas; P Diana Afonso; Paulo Rego; Florian Schmaranzer; Reto Sutter; Ara Kassarjian; Luca Sconfienza; Michael Dienst; Olufemi R Ayeni; Paul E Beaulé; Pedro Dantas; Radhesh Lalam; Marc-André Weber; Filip M Vanhoenacker; Tobias Johannes Dietrich; Lennart Jans; Philip Robinson; Apostolos H Karantanas; Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska; Suzanne Anderson; Iris Noebauer-Huhmann; Oliver Marin-Peña; Diego Collado; Marc Tey-Pons; Ehrenfried Schmaranzer; Mario Padron; Josef Kramer; Patrick O Zingg; Michel De Maeseneer; Eva Llopis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Classifying Cam Morphology by the Alpha Angle: A Systematic Review on Threshold Values.

Authors:  Pim van Klij; Michael P Reiman; Jan H Waarsing; Max Reijman; Wichor M Bramer; Jan A N Verhaar; Rintje Agricola
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-08-10

4.  3D CT segmentation of CAM type femoroacetabular impingement-reliability and relationship of CAM lesion with anthropomorphic features.

Authors:  Lihua Zhang; Joel E Wells; Riham Dessouky; Adam Gleason; Rajiv Chopra; Yonatan Chatzinoff; Nicholas P Fey; Yin Xi; Avneesh Chhabra
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Best Practices: Hip Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Arvin B Kheterpal; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Leg dominance as a risk factor for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Matthew T Philippi; Timothy L Kahn; Temitope F Adeyemi; Travis G Maak; Stephen K Aoki
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2020-02-13

7.  A three-dimensional measurement method on MR arthrography of the hip to classify femoro-acetabular impingement.

Authors:  Cosimo Nardi; Luisa De Falco; Giuseppe Caracchini; Linda Calistri; Laura Mercatelli; Stefano Cristin; Chiara Lorini; Edoardo Cavigli; Nicholas Landini; Martina Orlandi; Christian Carulli; Vittorio Miele
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.374

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.