Literature DB >> 21277896

Cross-phaseogram: objective neural index of speech sound differentiation.

Erika Skoe1, Trent Nicol, Nina Kraus.   

Abstract

We introduce a new approach, the cross-phaseogram, that captures the brain's ability to discriminate between spectrotemporally dynamic speech sounds, such as stop consonants. The goal was to develop an analysis technique for auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) that taps into the sub-millisecond temporal precision of the response but does not rely on subjective identification of individual response peaks. Using the cross-phaseogram technique, we show that time-varying frequency differences in speech stimuli manifest as phase differences in ABRs. By applying this automated and objective technique to a large dataset, we found these phase differences to be less pronounced in children who perform below average on a standardized test of listening to speech in noise. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our results, and the extension of the cross-phaseogram method to a wider range of stimuli and populations.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21277896      PMCID: PMC3056886          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  35 in total

1.  Cortical auditory signal processing in poor readers.

Authors:  S Nagarajan; H Mahncke; T Salz; P Tallal; T Roberts; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-05-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The contribution of EEG coherence to the investigation of language.

Authors:  Sabine Weiss; Horst M Mueller
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Cochlear phase and amplitude retrieved from the auditory nerve at arbitrary frequencies.

Authors:  Marcel van der Heijden; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Improving language and literacy is a matter of time.

Authors:  Paula Tallal
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 5.  Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds.

Authors:  P X Joris; C E Schreiner; A Rees
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 37.312

6.  Auditory brainstem responses to tone bursts in normally hearing subjects.

Authors:  M P Gorga; J R Kaminski; K A Beauchaine; W Jesteadt
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1988-03

7.  Human temporal auditory acuity as assessed by envelope following responses.

Authors:  David W Purcell; Sasha M John; Bruce A Schneider; Terence W Picton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise.

Authors:  M Nilsson; S D Soli; J A Sullivan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Human auditory cortical dynamics during perception of long acoustic sequences: phase tracking of carrier frequency by the auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  Aniruddh D Patel; Evan Balaban
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  18 in total

1.  A neural basis of speech-in-noise perception in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Han-Gyol Yi; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Playing Music for a Smarter Ear: Cognitive, Perceptual and Neurobiological Evidence.

Authors:  Dana Strait; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Music Percept       Date:  2011-12-01

3.  Musicians' enhanced neural differentiation of speech sounds arises early in life: developmental evidence from ages 3 to 30.

Authors:  Dana L Strait; Samantha O'Connell; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Inferior colliculus contributions to phase encoding of stop consonants in an animal model.

Authors:  Catherine M Warrier; Daniel A Abrams; Trent G Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Test-retest consistency of speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses in typically-developing children.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Erica Knowles; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Musicians have fine-tuned neural distinction of speech syllables.

Authors:  A Parbery-Clark; A Tierney; D L Strait; N Kraus
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Frequency-dependent effects of background noise on subcortical response timing.

Authors:  A Tierney; A Parbery-Clark; E Skoe; N Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  Biological impact of music and software-based auditory training.

Authors:  Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  Cognitive factors shape brain networks for auditory skills: spotlight on auditory working memory.

Authors:  Nina Kraus; Dana L Strait; Alexandra Parbery-Clark
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Analyzing the FFR: A tutorial for decoding the richness of auditory function.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.