Literature DB >> 10339614

Cortical auditory signal processing in poor readers.

S Nagarajan1, H Mahncke, T Salz, P Tallal, T Roberts, M M Merzenich.   

Abstract

Magnetoencephalographic responses recorded from auditory cortex evoked by brief and rapidly successive stimuli differed between adults with poor vs. good reading abilities in four important ways. First, the response amplitude evoked by short-duration acoustic stimuli was stronger in the post-stimulus time range of 150-200 ms in poor readers than in normal readers. Second, response amplitude to rapidly successive and brief stimuli that were identical or that differed significantly in frequency were substantially weaker in poor readers compared with controls, for interstimulus intervals of 100 or 200 ms, but not for an interstimulus interval of 500 ms. Third, this neurological deficit closely paralleled subjects' ability to distinguish between and to reconstruct the order of presentation of those stimulus sequences. Fourth, the average distributed response coherence evoked by rapidly successive stimuli was significantly weaker in the beta- and gamma-band frequency ranges (20-60 Hz) in poor readers, compared with controls. These results provide direct electrophysiological evidence supporting the hypothesis that reading disabilities are correlated with the abnormal neural representation of brief and rapidly successive sensory inputs, manifested in this study at the entry level of the cortical auditory/aural speech representational system(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10339614      PMCID: PMC26908          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  52 in total

1.  Behavioral lifetime of human auditory sensory memory predicted by physiological measures.

Authors:  Z L Lu; S J Williamson; L Kaufman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-12-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Auditory event-related potentials among dyslexic and normal-reading children: 3CLT and midline comparisons.

Authors:  A Erez; H Pratt
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.292

3.  Temporal integration in auditory sensory memory: neuromagnetic evidence.

Authors:  N Loveless; S Levänen; V Jousmäki; M Sams; R Hari
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-05

4.  Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dyslexia.

Authors:  S E Shaywitz; B A Shaywitz; K R Pugh; R K Fulbright; R T Constable; W E Mencl; D P Shankweiler; A M Liberman; P Skudlarski; J M Fletcher; L Katz; K E Marchione; C Lacadie; C Gatenby; J C Gore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Dichotic listening to temporal tonal stimuli by good and poor readers.

Authors:  S Harel; I Nachson
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1997-04

6.  Speech perception and the discrimination of brief auditory cues in reading disabled children.

Authors:  M A Reed
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1989-10

7.  Human oscillatory brain activity near 40 Hz coexists with cognitive temporal binding.

Authors:  M Joliot; U Ribary; R Llinás
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-11-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Brain potentials in developmental dyslexia: differential effects of word frequency in human subjects.

Authors:  S Johannes; G R Mangun; C L Kussmaul; T F Münte
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1995-08-11       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Auditory neurophysiologic responses and discrimination deficits in children with learning problems.

Authors:  N Kraus; T J McGee; T D Carrell; S G Zecker; T G Nicol; D B Koch
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-08-16       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Psychophysical evidence for a magnocellular pathway deficit in dyslexia.

Authors:  J B Demb; G M Boynton; M Best; D J Heeger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  62 in total

1.  The science of literacy: from the laboratory to the classroom.

Authors:  P Tallal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cortical activation during spoken-word segmentation in nonreading-impaired and dyslexic adults.

Authors:  Päivi Helenius; Riitta Salmelin; Elisabet Service; John F Connolly; Seija Leinonen; Heikki Lyytinen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex.

Authors:  E Ahissar; S Nagarajan; M Ahissar; A Protopapas; H Mahncke; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Plastic neural changes and reading improvement caused by audiovisual training in reading-impaired children.

Authors:  T Kujala; K Karma; R Ceponiene; S Belitz; P Turkkila; M Tervaniemi; R Näätänen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Temporal order and processing acuity of visual, auditory, and tactile perception in developmentally dyslexic young adults.

Authors:  M Laasonen; E Service; V Virsu
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Cross-phaseogram: objective neural index of speech sound differentiation.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Disruption of the neural response to rapid acoustic stimuli in dyslexia: evidence from functional MRI.

Authors:  E Temple; R A Poldrack; A Protopapas; S Nagarajan; T Salz; P Tallal; M M Merzenich; J D Gabrieli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Brainstem responses to speech syllables.

Authors:  Nicole Russo; Trent Nicol; Gabriella Musacchia; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Sex-dependent hemispheric asymmetries for processing frequency-modulated sounds in the primary auditory cortex of the mustached bat.

Authors:  Stuart D Washington; Jagmeet S Kanwal
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Reading and subcortical auditory function.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Jane Hornickel; Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.