Literature DB >> 21907782

Frequency-dependent effects of background noise on subcortical response timing.

A Tierney1, A Parbery-Clark, E Skoe, N Kraus.   

Abstract

The addition of background noise to an auditory signal delays brainstem response timing. This effect has been extensively documented using manual peak selection. Peak picking, however, is impractical for large-scale studies of spectrotemporally complex stimuli, and leaves open the question of whether noise-induced delays are frequency-dependent or occur across the frequency spectrum. Here we use an automated, objective method to examine phase shifts between auditory brainstem responses to a speech sound (/da/) presented with and without background noise. We predicted that shifts in neural response timing would also be reflected in frequency-specific phase shifts. Our results indicate that the addition of background noise causes phase shifts across the subcortical response spectrum (70-1000 Hz). However, this noise-induced delay is not uniform such that some frequency bands show greater shifts than others: low-frequency phase shifts (300-500 Hz) are largest during the response to the consonant-vowel formant transition (/d/), while high-frequency shifts (720-1000 Hz) predominate during the response to the steady-state vowel (/a/). Most importantly, phase shifts occurring in specific frequency bands correlate strongly with shifts in the latencies of the predominant peaks in the auditory brainstem response, while phase shifts in other frequency bands do not. This finding confirms the validity of phase shift detection as an objective measure of timing differences and reveals that this method detects noise-induced shifts in timing that may not be captured by traditional peak latency measurements.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21907782      PMCID: PMC3230695          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  32 in total

1.  Human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones: phase and latency measurements.

Authors:  M S John; T W Picton
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Brainstem responses to speech syllables.

Authors:  Nicole Russo; Trent Nicol; Gabriella Musacchia; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Learning impaired children exhibit timing deficits and training-related improvements in auditory cortical responses to speech in noise.

Authors:  Catherine M Warrier; Krista L Johnson; Erin A Hayes; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Perception of speech in noise: neural correlates.

Authors:  Judy H Song; Erika Skoe; Karen Banai; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. I. Rate and intensity effects.

Authors:  R Burkard; K Hecox
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Brain-stem responses when masking with wide-band and high-pass filtered noise.

Authors:  I Thümmler; G Tietze; P Matkei
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1981

7.  Auditory phonemic perception in dyslexia: categorical identification and discrimination of stop consonants.

Authors:  J Brandt; J J Rosen
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Cochlear distribution of frequency-following response initiation. A high-pass masking noise study.

Authors:  O Yamada; K Kodera; R F Hink; J I Suzuki
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1979

9.  A comparison of the effects of broadband masking noise on the auditory brainstem response in young and older adults.

Authors:  Robert F Burkard; Donald Sims
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.493

10.  Effect of click rate on the latency of auditory brain stem responses in humans.

Authors:  M Don; A R Allen; A Starr
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  5 in total

1.  Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Anusha Yellamsetty; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Musicians have fine-tuned neural distinction of speech syllables.

Authors:  A Parbery-Clark; A Tierney; D L Strait; N Kraus
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Bilinguals' speech perception in noise: Perceptual and neural associations.

Authors:  Dana Bsharat-Maalouf; Hanin Karawani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  High school music classes enhance the neural processing of speech.

Authors:  Adam Tierney; Jennifer Krizman; Erika Skoe; Kathleen Johnston; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-06

Review 5.  Parameters for Applying the Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential with Speech Stimulus: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Luísa Bello Gabriel; Luíza Silva Vernier; Maria Inês Dornelles da Costa Ferreira; Adriana Laybauer Silveira; Márcia Salgado Machado
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.