Literature DB >> 3352259

Auditory brainstem responses to tone bursts in normally hearing subjects.

M P Gorga1, J R Kaminski, K A Beauchaine, W Jesteadt.   

Abstract

Auditory brainstem responses were recorded from 20 normally hearing subjects using tone-burst stimuli that were gated with cosine-squared functions. Clear responses were observed over a wide range of frequencies and levels. These responses were highly reproducible within individual subjects and were reliably measured by two independent examiners. ABR thresholds were higher than behavioral thresholds for all frequencies, especially for lower frequencies. Intersubject variability also was greater for lower frequencies. Wave-V latencies decreased with increases in both frequency and level for frequencies from 250 to 8000 Hz and for levels from 20 to 100 dB SPL. The standard deviations seldom exceeded 10% of the mean wave-V latency for any combination of level and frequency. These latencies can be viewed as the sum of both a peripheral and a central component. Assuming that the central component is relatively independent of both frequency and level, changes of wave V latency must be related to peripheral factors, such as travel time along the cochlear partition, and to stimulus characteristics, such as rise time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3352259     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3101.87

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  39 in total

1.  Cross-phaseogram: objective neural index of speech sound differentiation.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Determining the upper limits of stimulation for auditory steady-state response measurements.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Brenda M Hoover; Darcia M Dierking; Kathryn L Beauchaine; Carol Manning
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Specialization for underwater hearing by the tympanic middle ear of the turtle, Trachemys scripta elegans.

Authors:  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Christian Brandt; Katie L Willis; Christian Bech Christensen; Darlene Ketten; Peggy Edds-Walton; Richard R Fay; Peter T Madsen; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  A direct approach for the design of chirp stimuli used for the recording of auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Manuel Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Objective neural indices of speech-in-noise perception.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

6.  The middle ear muscle reflex in the diagnosis of cochlear neuropathy.

Authors:  Michelle D Valero; Kenneth E Hancock; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Paul J Abbas; Viral D Tejani; Rachel A Scheperle; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Assessing stimulus and subject influences on auditory evoked potentials and their relation to peripheral physiology in green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea).

Authors:  Nathan P Buerkle; Katrina M Schrode; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.320

9.  [Frequency specific auditory evoked responses. Experiments on stimulus polarity, sweep frequency, stimulus duration, notched-noise masking level, and threshold estimation in volunteers with normal hearing].

Authors:  R Schönweiler; A Neumann; M Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 10.  New perspectives on assessing amplification effects.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.