Literature DB >> 21243403

The relationship between stimulus intensity and response amplitude for the photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram.

A M Binns1, K E Mortlock, R V North.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between stimulus intensity and response amplitude for the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the flash ERG. Specific aims were (i) to determine whether a generalized Naka-Rushton function provided a good fit to the intensity-response data and (ii) to determine the variability of the parameters of the best-fitting Naka-Rushton models. Electroretinograms were recorded in 18 participants, on two occasions, using both DTL fibre and skin active electrodes, in response to Ganzfeld red stimuli (Lee filter "terry red") ranging in stimulus strength from -1.30 to 0.53 log cd.s.m(-2) (0.28-2.11 log phot td.s) presented over a steady blue background (Schott glass filter BG28; 3.9 log scot td). PhNR amplitude was measured from b-wave peak and from pre-stimulus baseline. The Naka-Rushton function was fitted to all intensity-response data, and parameters, 'n', 'Vmax' and 'K' were obtained. Coefficients of variation (CoV), and inter-ocular and inter-session limits of agreement (LoA) were calculated for both Naka-Rushton parameters. A generalized Naka-Rushton function was found to provide a good fit to the intensity-response data, except at the highest stimulus intensity, where a reduction in amplitude occurred in many individuals. The 'Vmax' parameter was less variable than 'K' for all intensity-response data. Variability was lower for DTL than skin electrodes, and for peak-to-trough PhNR measurements, compared to baseline-to-trough. This study has demonstrated for the first time that the Naka-Rushton model provides a useful means of quantifying the intensity-response relationship of the PhNR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21243403     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-010-9257-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  49 in total

1.  The photopic hill: a new phenomenon of the light adapted electroretinogram.

Authors:  N Wali; L E Leguire
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Hongling Chen; Dezheng Wu; Shizhou Huang; Hong Yan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  The s-cone PHNR and pattern ERG in primary open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  N Drasdo; Y H Aldebasi; Z Chiti; K E Mortlock; J E Morgan; R V North
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Dark-adapted luminance-response functions with skin and corneal electrodes.

Authors:  N Wali; L E Leguire
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  S Viswanathan; L J Frishman; J G Robson; J W Walters
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Properties of electroretinographic intensity-response functions in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  R W Massof; L Wu; D Finkelstein; C Perry; S J Starr; M A Johnson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-05-30       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Selective loss of the photopic negative response in patients with optic nerve atrophy.

Authors:  Yasutaka Gotoh; Shigeki Machida; Yutaka Tazawa
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03

Review 8.  Update on the pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma.

Authors:  Michael Bach; Michael B Hoffmann
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Improved electrode for electroretinography.

Authors:  W W Dawson; G L Trick; C A Litzkow
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Fundus pigmentation and the dark-adapted electroretinogram.

Authors:  N Wali; L E Leguire
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

View more
  13 in total

1.  Spectral characteristics of the PhNR in the full-field flash electroretinogram of normals and glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Jan Kremers; Mounira Jertila; Barbara Link; Gobinda Pangeni; Folkert K Horn
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Han Cheng; Ying-Sheng Hu; Rosa A Tang; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Electoretinographic evidence of retinal ganglion cell-dependent function in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Pantea Moghimi; Nathalia Torres Jimenez; Linda K McLoon; Theoden I Netoff; Michael S Lee; Angus MacDonald; Robert F Miller
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Intensity response function of the photopic negative response (PhNR): effect of age and test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Nabin R Joshi; Emma Ly; Suresh Viswanathan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Photopic negative response using a handheld mini-ganzfeld stimulator in healthy adults: normative values, intra- and inter-session variability.

Authors:  Adriana Berezovsky; Rustum Karanjia; Arthur Gustavo Fernandes; Gabriel Izan Santos Botelho; Tatiane Luana Novele Bueno; Nívea Nunes Ferraz; Paula Yuri Sacai; Stuart Glenn Coupland; Alfredo Arrigo Sadun; Solange Rios Salomão
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  The photopic negative response of the Light-adapted 3.0 ERG in clinical settings.

Authors:  Gonzalo Ortiz; David Drucker; Connor Hyde; Joseph Staffetti; Jan Kremers; Radouil Tzekov
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 7.  Electroretinography in glaucoma diagnosis.

Authors:  Laura J Wilsey; Brad Fortune
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.761

8.  ISCEV extended protocol for the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the full-field electroretinogram.

Authors:  Laura Frishman; Maja Sustar; Jan Kremers; J Jason McAnany; Marc Sarossy; Radouil Tzekov; Suresh Viswanathan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Optimizing a Portable ERG Device for Glaucoma Clinic: The Effect of Interstimulus Frequency on the Photopic Negative Response.

Authors:  Flora Hui; Jessica Tang; Xavier Hadoux; Michael Coote; Jonathan G Crowston
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Baseline Detrending for the Photopic Negative Response.

Authors:  Jessica Tang; Flora Hui; Michael Coote; Jonathan G Crowston; Xavier Hadoux
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.