Literature DB >> 1505334

Fundus pigmentation and the dark-adapted electroretinogram.

N Wali1, L E Leguire.   

Abstract

Dark-adapted electroretinograms were obtained over a 3.6-log range of stimulus intensities from 17 black and 15 white normal subjects. Subjects were grouped on the basis of light or dark fundus pigmentation, determined from digitized fundus photographs. B-wave amplitudes for each group were fitted by the Naka-Rushton equation, and the measures Vmax, log K, and n were determined. The luminance-response functions revealed that subjects with light fundi had larger b-wave amplitudes at all luminance levels. There was a significant difference between groups for Vmax and n but not for log K. A comparison of b-wave implicit times showed no significant difference between subjects with dark and light fundi. Ancillary tests and multiple regression analysis suggested that the relationship between Vmax and fundus pigmentation could not be attributed to age, gender, refractive error, axial length or intraocular pressure. The results have implications for the collection of normative electroretinographic data and for the interpretation of electroretinogram results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1505334     DOI: 10.1007/bf00161226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  20 in total

1.  Dark-adapted luminance-response functions with skin and corneal electrodes.

Authors:  N Wali; L E Leguire
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Neovascularization in central retinal vein occlusion: electroretinographic findings.

Authors:  M A Johnson; S Marcus; M J Elman; T J McPhee
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-03

3.  The importance of the fact that melanin is black.

Authors:  J McGinness; P Proctor
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  A modified ERG technique and the results obtained in X-linked retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  G B Arden; R M Carter; C R Hogg; D J Powell; W J Ernst; G M Clover; A L Lyness; M P Quinlan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  S-potentials from colour units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae).

Authors:  K I Naka; W A Rushton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Human rhodopsin measurement using a T.V.-based imaging fundus reflectometer.

Authors:  D J Faulkner; C M Kemp
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Inappropriate use of albino animals as models in research.

Authors:  D Creel
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  Retinal pigment epithelial lipofuscin and melanin and choroidal melanin in human eyes.

Authors:  J J Weiter; F C Delori; G L Wing; K A Fitch
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Scotopic stimulus/response relations of the B-wave of the electroretinogram.

Authors:  A B Fulton; R M Hansen
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Rod ERGs in children with hereditary retinal degeneration.

Authors:  D G Birch; G E Fish
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.402

View more
  16 in total

1.  Development of receptoral responses in pigmented and albino guinea-pigs (Cavia porcellus).

Authors:  B V Bui; A J Vingrys
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The photopic hill: a new phenomenon of the light adapted electroretinogram.

Authors:  N Wali; L E Leguire
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Quantitative fundus autofluorescence in healthy eyes.

Authors:  Jonathan P Greenberg; Tobias Duncker; Russell L Woods; R Theodore Smith; Janet R Sparrow; François C Delori
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  The relationship between stimulus intensity and response amplitude for the photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram.

Authors:  A M Binns; K E Mortlock; R V North
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Comparison between albino and pigmented rabbit ERGs.

Authors:  Gabriela Lourençon Ioshimoto; Amanda Alves Camargo; André Maurício Passos Liber; Balázs Vince Nagy; Francisco Max Damico; Dora Fix Ventura
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  ISCEV extended protocol for the stimulus-response series for the dark-adapted full-field ERG b-wave.

Authors:  Mary A Johnson; Brett G Jeffrey; André M V Messias; Anthony G Robson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Postnatal retinal development as measured by the electroretinogram in premature infants.

Authors:  M B Mets; V C Smith; J Pokorny; A Pass
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Fundus pigmentation and the electroretinographic luminance-response function.

Authors:  N Wali; L E Leguire
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Inter-subject, inter-ocular and inter-session repeatability of the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram recorded using DTL and skin electrodes.

Authors:  Katharine E Mortlock; Alison M Binns; Yousef H Aldebasi; Rachel V North
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Comparison of visual function in pigmented and albino rats by electroretinography and visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Peter Heiduschka; Ulrich Schraermeyer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.