Literature DB >> 22273726

The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in multiple sclerosis.

Jing Wang1, Han Cheng, Ying-Sheng Hu, Rosa A Tang, Laura J Frishman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To use the photopic electroretinogram (ERG) to evaluate retinal function in eyes of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with and without a history of optic neuritis (ON) and to compare the functional and structural status of the inner retina.
METHODS: Full-field ERG responses to brief red flashes (0.04-2.8 cd · s/m²) on a rod-saturating blue background were recorded from 51 MS patients and 33 age-matched control subjects. In patients, perimetry was performed and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) was assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and scanning laser polarimetry (SLP). MS eyes were separated into groups: "ON >6" months (n = 25), "ON <6" months (n = 29), and "no ON" (n = 33) based on positive or negative history of ON and time since the last episode. Thirteen ON<6 eyes were re-evaluated 1 year later.
RESULTS: PhNR amplitudes were lower in ON>6, ON<6, and no-ON eyes (mean ± SD, 17.3 ± 7.6, 16.0 ± 6.5, and 23.8 ± 9.3 μV, respectively), than in control eyes (29.8 ± 6.5 μV; P < 0.001) for a standard stimulus of 1.42 cd · s/m²; a- and b-wave amplitudes were unaffected. PhNR amplitudes correlated with visual fields mean deviation (MD) in ON>6 (r² = 0.43; P < 0.001) and no-ON eyes (r² = 0.10; P < 0.05), with similar results for weaker stimuli. PhNR amplitudes correlated with RNFLT in ON>6 eyes: OCT (r² = 0.52; P < 0.0001) and SLP (r² = 0.51; P < 0.01); and in no-ON eyes, OCT (r² = 0.21; P < 0.01) and SLP (r² = 0.17; P < 0.05). ON<6 amplitudes did not correlate significantly with other measures, but increased after 1 year by 5.1 ± 3.1 μV (P < 0.001), visual fields MD increased by 1.8 ± 2.3 dB (P < 0.05), and RNFL loss persisted.
CONCLUSIONS: Photopic ERG PhNR amplitudes in MS patients are significantly reduced in eyes with and without a history of ON.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22273726      PMCID: PMC3339907          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  50 in total

1.  The uniform field and pattern ERG in macaques with experimental glaucoma: removal of spiking activity.

Authors:  S Viswanathan; L J Frishman; J G Robson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  The s-cone PHNR and pattern ERG in primary open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  N Drasdo; Y H Aldebasi; Z Chiti; K E Mortlock; J E Morgan; R V North
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  S Viswanathan; L J Frishman; J G Robson; J W Walters
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Distribution of potassium conductance in mammalian Müller (glial) cells: a comparative study.

Authors:  E A Newman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Pattern electroretinograms in optic neuritis during the acute stage and after remission.

Authors:  T A Berninger; W Heider
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Clinicopathological study of the visual pathways, eyes, and cerebral hemispheres in 32 cases of disseminated sclerosis.

Authors:  D Toussaint; O Périer; A Verstappen; S Bervoets
Journal:  J Clin Neuroophthalmol       Date:  1983-09

7.  The human rod ERG: correlation with psychophysical responses in light and dark adaptation.

Authors:  A B Fulton; W A Rushton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Acute axonal damage in multiple sclerosis is most extensive in early disease stages and decreases over time.

Authors:  Tanja Kuhlmann; Gueanelle Lingfeld; Andreas Bitsch; Jana Schuchardt; Wolfgang Brück
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Photopic ERGs in patients with optic neuropathies: comparison with primate ERGs after pharmacologic blockade of inner retina.

Authors:  Nalini V Rangaswamy; Laura J Frishman; E Ulysses Dorotheo; Jade S Schiffman; Hasan M Bahrani; Rosa A Tang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Scanning laser polarimetry of edematous and atrophic optic nerve heads.

Authors:  Michelle C Banks; Nathalie J Robe-Collignon; Joseph F Rizzo; Louis R Pasquale
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-04
View more
  31 in total

1.  The Photopic Negative Response in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  Heather E Moss; Jason C Park; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Test-retest reliability of the multifocal photopic negative response.

Authors:  Anthony W Van Alstine; Suresh Viswanathan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Molecular, anatomical and functional changes in the retinal ganglion cells after optic nerve crush in mice.

Authors:  Masayoshi Yukita; Shigeki Machida; Koji M Nishiguchi; Satoru Tsuda; Yu Yokoyama; Masayuki Yasuda; Kazuichi Maruyama; Toru Nakazawa
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Intensity response function of the photopic negative response (PhNR): effect of age and test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Nabin R Joshi; Emma Ly; Suresh Viswanathan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Electroretinography in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: comparison of the pattern ERG and the photopic negative response.

Authors:  Jason C Park; Heather E Moss; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Relation between macular retinal ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer thickness and multifocal electroretinogram measures in experimental glaucoma.

Authors:  Xunda Luo; Nimesh B Patel; Lakshmi P Rajagopalan; Ronald S Harwerth; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Photopic negative response using a handheld mini-ganzfeld stimulator in healthy adults: normative values, intra- and inter-session variability.

Authors:  Adriana Berezovsky; Rustum Karanjia; Arthur Gustavo Fernandes; Gabriel Izan Santos Botelho; Tatiane Luana Novele Bueno; Nívea Nunes Ferraz; Paula Yuri Sacai; Stuart Glenn Coupland; Alfredo Arrigo Sadun; Solange Rios Salomão
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  The photopic negative response of the Light-adapted 3.0 ERG in clinical settings.

Authors:  Gonzalo Ortiz; David Drucker; Connor Hyde; Joseph Staffetti; Jan Kremers; Radouil Tzekov
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Comparisons of cone electroretinograms after indocyanine green-, brilliant blue G-, or triamcinolone acetonide-assisted macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Shigeki Machida; Yoshiharu Toba; Tomoharu Nishimura; Takayuki Ohzeki; Ken-ichi Murai; Daijiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 10.  Visual electrophysiology in the clinical evaluation of optic neuritis, chiasmal tumours, achiasmia, and ocular albinism: an overview.

Authors:  Jelka Brecelj
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.