Literature DB >> 32681419

Photopic negative response using a handheld mini-ganzfeld stimulator in healthy adults: normative values, intra- and inter-session variability.

Adriana Berezovsky1, Rustum Karanjia2,3,4,5, Arthur Gustavo Fernandes6, Gabriel Izan Santos Botelho6, Tatiane Luana Novele Bueno6, Nívea Nunes Ferraz6, Paula Yuri Sacai6, Stuart Glenn Coupland4,5, Alfredo Arrigo Sadun2,3, Solange Rios Salomão6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine normative values, intra- and inter-session variability for a range of parameters derived from the photopic negative response (PhNR) using a handheld mini-Ganzfeld stimulator in healthy normal adults.
METHODS: Light-adapted flash full-field electroretinograms (ERGs) were recorded from healthy individuals with no visual complaints, visual acuity equal to or better than 0.0 logMAR (20/20 Snellen), and negative family history for visual diseases. ERGs were recorded from both eyes using a DTL® type fiber electrode after dilation of the pupils with instillation of 1 drop of tropicamide eye drops (1%). The full-field PhNR stimulus conditions were produced by a LED-based ColorBurst™ (Diagnosys LLC, Lowell, MA, USA) handheld stimulator. Red flashes of 1, 5 and 7 cd.s/m2 on a blue background of 10 cd/m2 were presented. A-wave, b-wave and PhNR amplitude (determined by both baseline to trough-BT and peak to trough-PT) and peak times were analyzed. Normal limits were determined as 5% percentile for amplitudes and 95% percentile for latencies. Intra- and inter-session variability were assessed with Wilcoxon signed-rank test, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the coefficient of variability (COV).
RESULTS: Normative limits for PhNR amplitude (µV) using 1, 5 and 7 cd.s./m2 stimuli were, respectively: 20.81; 18.06 and 19.60 for BT and 69.11; 77.98; 76.51 for PT. Peak times (ms) normative limits for 1, 5 and 7 cd.s/m2 intensities were, respectively, 65.98; 78.20 and 77.96. Overall, intra-session variability assessed by coefficients of variation ranged from 1.35 to 10.28%. Inter-session variability disclosed significant intraclass correlation values for all PhNR parameters only for 1 cd.s/m2 stimuli.
CONCLUSIONS: The normative values provided by this study are clinically helpful in the diagnosis of inner retinal disorders, especially those affecting retinal ganglion cells such as glaucoma and other optic neuropathies. Further studies, including a larger sample with variable age range would extend the validity of the current results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electroretinogram; Norms; Photopic negative response; Variability

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32681419     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-020-09784-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  39 in total

1.  Pattern electroretinogram to detect glaucoma: comparing the PERGLA and the PERG Ratio protocols.

Authors:  Michael Bach; Anke Ramharter-Sereinig
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The relationship between stimulus intensity and response amplitude for the photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram.

Authors:  A M Binns; K E Mortlock; R V North
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2015 update).

Authors:  Daphne L McCulloch; Michael F Marmor; Mitchell G Brigell; Ruth Hamilton; Graham E Holder; Radouil Tzekov; Michael Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  The decline of the photopic negative response (PhNR) in the rat after optic nerve transection.

Authors:  B Li; G E Barnes; W F Holt
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  A proximal retinal component in the primate photopic ERG a-wave.

Authors:  R A Bush; P A Sieving
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma.

Authors:  S Viswanathan; L J Frishman; J G Robson; R S Harwerth; E L Smith
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Photopic ERGs in patients with optic neuropathies: comparison with primate ERGs after pharmacologic blockade of inner retina.

Authors:  Nalini V Rangaswamy; Laura J Frishman; E Ulysses Dorotheo; Jade S Schiffman; Hasan M Bahrani; Rosa A Tang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Photopic ERG negative response from amacrine cell signaling in RCS rat retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Shigeki Machida; Dorit Raz-Prag; Robert N Fariss; Paul A Sieving; Ronald A Bush
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  ISCEV guide to visual electrodiagnostic procedures.

Authors:  Anthony G Robson; Josefin Nilsson; Shiying Li; Subhadra Jalali; Anne B Fulton; Alma Patrizia Tormene; Graham E Holder; Scott E Brodie
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  A Comparison of the RETeval Sensor Strip and DTL Electrode for Recording the Photopic Negative Response.

Authors:  Jessica Tang; Flora Hui; Xavier Hadoux; Marc Sarossy; Peter van Wijngaarden; Michael Coote; Jonathan G Crowston
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.283

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impaired Ganglion Cell Function Objectively Assessed by the Photopic Negative Response in Affected and Asymptomatic Members From Brazilian Families With Leber's Hereditary Optic Neuropathy.

Authors:  Gabriel Izan Santos Botelho; Solange Rios Salomão; Célia Harumi Tengan; Rustum Karanjia; Felipo Victor Moura; Daniel Martins Rocha; Paula Baptista Eliseo da Silva; Arthur Gustavo Fernandes; Sung Eun Song Watanabe; Paula Yuri Sacai; Rubens Belfort; Valerio Carelli; Alfredo Arrigo Sadun; Adriana Berezovsky
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 2.  Retinal Ganglion Cells-Diversity of Cell Types and Clinical Relevance.

Authors:  Ungsoo Samuel Kim; Omar A Mahroo; John D Mollon; Patrick Yu-Wai-Man
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.003

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.