Literature DB >> 1935545

Dark-adapted luminance-response functions with skin and corneal electrodes.

N Wali1, L E Leguire.   

Abstract

Normative dark-adapted electroretinograms were recorded simultaneously with a skin electrode and corneal electrode for varying stimulus intensities. The electroretinogram b-wave amplitudes for each electrode were fitted by the Naka-Rushton equation, and the parameters Vmax, K and n were evaluated. A comparison of parameters between the two electrodes showed a significant difference for Vmax and K but not for n. Vmax was approximately eight times smaller and K was 0.3 log unit smaller for the skin electrode than for the corneal electrode. B-wave amplitude and implicit time were also compared between the two electrodes. The b-wave amplitude ratio of the corneal electrode to that of the skin electrode increased with luminance and ranged from 1.83 to 7.68. Overall, b-wave implicit time for the skin electrode was approximately 10 ms shorter than that of the corneal electrode.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1935545     DOI: 10.1007/bf00142675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  24 in total

1.  Neovascularization in central retinal vein occlusion: electroretinographic findings.

Authors:  M A Johnson; S Marcus; M J Elman; T J McPhee
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-03

2.  Effect of scleral recording location on ERG amplitude.

Authors:  S J Cringle; V A Alder; M J Brown; D Y Yu
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.424

3.  The electroretinogram of a cone-monochromat.

Authors:  H Ikeda; H Ripps
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1966-04

4.  Cone dystrophy, nyctalopia, and supernormal rod responses. A new retinal degeneration.

Authors:  P Gouras; H M Eggers; C J MacKay
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-05

5.  Pattern electroretinogram: use of noncorneal skin electrodes.

Authors:  L E Leguire; G L Rogers
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Electrophysiologic testing and its specific application in unsedated children.

Authors:  T D France
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1984

7.  Electroretinography with noncorneal and corneal electrodes.

Authors:  J F Giltrow-Tyler; S J Crews; N Drasdo
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  S-potentials from colour units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae).

Authors:  K I Naka; W A Rushton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  The electroretinogram.

Authors:  A Harden; G G Adams; D S Taylor
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  ERG electrode in pediatric patients: comparison of DTL fiber, PVA-gel, and non-corneal skin electrodes.

Authors:  S G Coupland; M Janaky
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.379

View more
  10 in total

1.  The relationship between stimulus intensity and response amplitude for the photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram.

Authors:  A M Binns; K E Mortlock; R V North
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Effect of shorter dark adaptation on ISCEV standard DA 0.01 and DA 3 skin ERGs in healthy adults.

Authors:  R Hamilton; K Graham
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  A CTRP5 gene S163R mutation knock-in mouse model for late-onset retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Venkata R M Chavali; Naheed W Khan; Catherine A Cukras; Dirk-Uwe Bartsch; Monica M Jablonski; Radha Ayyagari
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  ISCEV extended protocol for the stimulus-response series for the dark-adapted full-field ERG b-wave.

Authors:  Mary A Johnson; Brett G Jeffrey; André M V Messias; Anthony G Robson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Fundus pigmentation and the electroretinographic luminance-response function.

Authors:  N Wali; L E Leguire
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Comparison of guinea pig electroretinograms measured with bipolar corneal and unipolar intravitreal electrodes.

Authors:  B V Bui; H S Weisinger; A J Sinclair; A J Vingrys
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Comparison of ERGs recorded with skin and corneal-contact electrodes in normal children and adults.

Authors:  Keith Bradshaw; Ronald Hansen; Anne Fulton
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Inter-subject, inter-ocular and inter-session repeatability of the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram recorded using DTL and skin electrodes.

Authors:  Katharine E Mortlock; Alison M Binns; Yousef H Aldebasi; Rachel V North
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Fundus pigmentation and the dark-adapted electroretinogram.

Authors:  N Wali; L E Leguire
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Rd9 is a naturally occurring mouse model of a common form of retinitis pigmentosa caused by mutations in RPGR-ORF15.

Authors:  Debra A Thompson; Naheed W Khan; Mohammad I Othman; Bo Chang; Lin Jia; Garrett Grahek; Zhijian Wu; Suja Hiriyanna; Jacob Nellissery; Tiansen Li; Hemant Khanna; Peter Colosi; Anand Swaroop; John R Heckenlively
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.