Literature DB >> 6468246

Properties of electroretinographic intensity-response functions in retinitis pigmentosa.

R W Massof, L Wu, D Finkelstein, C Perry, S J Starr, M A Johnson.   

Abstract

Dark-adapted electroretinogram (ERG) b-wave amplitudes and implicit times were recorded as a function of stimulus luminance for 15 retinitis pigmentosa (RP) patients and 15 normal subjects. B-wave amplitude as a function of log stimulus luminance was fit by non-linear regression with the Naka-Rushton equation, which has 3 independent parameters: The maximum response (Rmax), slope (n) and half-saturation constant (K). B-wave implicit-time as a function of log stimulus luminance was fit by linear regression. Compared to normal, the RP Rmax values were markedly reduced, suggesting response compression; the RP K values were elevated by an average of 0.76 log unit, suggesting relatively small losses in retinal sensitivity. There was no correspondence between Rmax and visual field area for the RP patients (coefficient of correlation = -0.02). All but 2 of the 15 RP patients had normal or shallower-than-normal implicit-time intensity-response functions, indicating that over most of the dynamic range of the ERG, the implicit-times were either normal or faster-than-normal. These results are discussed in terms of possible RP disease mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6468246     DOI: 10.1007/bf00143087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  17 in total

1.  ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL STUDIES IN EARLY RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA.

Authors:  P GOURAS; R E CARR
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1964-07

2.  Detection of the electroretinogram in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  J C ARMINGTON; P GOURAS; D I TEPAS; R GUNKEL
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  1961-09       Impact factor: 3.467

3.  Electroretinography: Some basic principles.

Authors:  P Gouras
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1970-08

4.  Cone and rod responses in a family with recessively inherited retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  E L Berson; L Kanters
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1970-09

5.  Electroretinography and retinitis pigmentosa. No discrimination between genetic subtypes.

Authors:  D S Rothberg; G W Weinstein; R R Hobson; T M Nork
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-09

6.  Rod sensitivity relative to cone sensitivity in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  R W Massof; D Finkelstein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Prereceptor light absorption in setters with neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis.

Authors:  R W Massof; M A Johnson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  S-potentials from colour units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae).

Authors:  K I Naka; W A Rushton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Local and stray light components of the human electroretinogram due to stimulation by light subtending a 20 degree visual field.

Authors:  Y Liu; C Yang
Journal:  Sci Sin       Date:  1966-05

10.  Temporal aspects of the dark-adapted cone a-wave in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  M A Sandberg; P L Sullivan; E L Berson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  24 in total

1.  Assessing the impact of non-dilating the eye on full-field electroretinogram and standard flash response.

Authors:  A-M Gagné; J Lavoie; M-P Lavoie; A Sasseville; M-C Charron; M Hébert
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Light adaptation and the luminance-response function of the cone electroretinogram.

Authors:  N S Peachey; K R Alexander; D J Derlacki; G A Fishman
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Longitudinal electroretinogram study in a patient with metallosis oculi.

Authors:  A L Marchese
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Effect of dietary docosahexaenoic acid on rhodopsin content and packing in photoreceptor cell membranes.

Authors:  Subhadip Senapati; Megan Gragg; Ivy S Samuels; Vipul M Parmar; Akiko Maeda; Paul S-H Park
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.747

5.  The relationship between stimulus intensity and response amplitude for the photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram.

Authors:  A M Binns; K E Mortlock; R V North
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Intensity response function of the photopic negative response (PhNR): effect of age and test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Nabin R Joshi; Emma Ly; Suresh Viswanathan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Flicker electroretinogram in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  R W Massof; M A Johnson; J S Sunness; C Perry; D Finkelstein
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-03-31       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  ISCEV extended protocol for the stimulus-response series for the dark-adapted full-field ERG b-wave.

Authors:  Mary A Johnson; Brett G Jeffrey; André M V Messias; Anthony G Robson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Comparison of three methods of estimating the parameters of the Naka-Rushton equation.

Authors:  L S Evans; N S Peachey; A L Marchese
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Clinical electroretinography in the dog with ganzfeld stimulation: a practical method of examining rod and cone function.

Authors:  K Narfström; B E Andersson; S Andreasson; P Gouras
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.