Literature DB >> 21222101

The concept of complete footprint restoration with guidelines for single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Rainer Siebold1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This article introduces guidelines for single- (SB) and double-bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction based on the concept of complete footprint restoration. The goal is to reconstruct a maximum of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insertion site area to regain a maximum of ACL function. The concept is based on the hypothesis that the restored biomechanical envelope of the knee is a function of reconstructed ACL insertion site area.
METHODS: Individual combinations of graft diameters and drill angles were calculated and matched for all individual insertion site lengths between 8 and 21 mm to maximize the percentage of anatomical footprint restoration. An "insertion site table" was developed to propose individual guidelines during ACL surgery for SB and DB ACL reconstruction based on the intraoperative measurement of the tibial insertion site length.
RESULTS: Our calculations support the use of SB in "small footprints" up to 13 mm, which may restore more than 95% of the native insertion site length. "Intermediate footprints" between 14 and 15 mm may be restored by both a SB or DB ACL reconstruction. For "larger footprints" of 16 mm or more, DB has the potential to replicate 97% or more of the insertion site length which cannot be achieved by a SB ACL reconstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: The concept of complete footprint restoration aims to reconstruct a maximum of ACL insertion site area to restore a maximum of functional envelope of the knee. Depending on the individual situation, different surgical approaches (SB/DB), graft diameters and drill angles may apply. An "insertion site table" was designed to give guidelines for SB and DB reconstruction during surgery. According to the new concept, DB ACL reconstruction is only considered as a surgical tool for large footprints and is not indicated for smaller ones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21222101     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1376-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  63 in total

1.  Cadaveric knee observation study for describing anatomic femoral tunnel placement for two-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Mochizuki; Takeshi Muneta; Tsuyoshi Nagase; Shin-Ichi Shirasawa; Kei-Ich Akita; Ichiro Sekiya
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study.

Authors:  Timo Järvelä
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The fetal anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic and histologic study.

Authors:  Mario Ferretti; Eric A Levicoff; Trevor A Macpherson; Morey S Moreland; Moises Cohen; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Rectangular tunnel double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft to mimic natural fiber arrangement.

Authors:  Konsei Shino; Ken Nakata; Norimasa Nakamura; Yukiyoshi Toritsuka; Shuji Horibe; Shigeto Nakagawa; Tomoyuki Suzuki
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Changes in the length of virtual anterior cruciate ligament fibers during stability testing: a comparison of conventional single-bundle reconstruction and native anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Robert H Brophy; James E Voos; Fintan J Shannon; Carinne C Granchi; Thomas L Wickiewicz; Russell F Warren; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Richard B Meredick; Kennan J Vance; David Appleby; James H Lubowitz
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Stability evaluation of single-bundle and double-bundle reconstruction during navigated ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Ishibashi; Eiichi Tsuda; Akira Fukuda; Harehiko Tsukada; Satoshi Toh
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rev       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament: a blueprint for repair and reconstruction.

Authors:  J A Dodds; S P Arnoczky
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Comparative kinematic evaluation of all-inside single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Andrew G Tsai; Coen A Wijdicks; Michael P Walsh; Robert F Laprade
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry, arthroscopic landmarks, and orientation model for bone tunnel placement.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold; Thomas Ellert; Stefan Metz; Juergen Metz
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  39 in total

1.  Double-bundle bone-patellar tendon-bone and gracilis in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  David Dejour; Paolo Ferrua; Nicolas Bonin; Paulo Renato Fernandes Saggin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Geometric considerations regarding the surface of the tibial insertion of the ACL graft.

Authors:  Miroslav Milankov; Dragan Savic; Zoran Milojevic
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Restoration of the tibial ACL footprint area and geometry using the Modified Insertion Site Table.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold; Peter Schuhmacher
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Variation in the shape of the tibial insertion site of the anterior cruciate ligament: classification is required.

Authors:  Daniel Guenther; Sebastian Irarrázaval; Yuichiro Nishizawa; Cara Vernacchia; Eric Thorhauer; Volker Musahl; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  No difference in osteoarthritis after surgical and non-surgical treatment of ACL-injured knees after 10 years.

Authors:  Dimitrios Tsoukas; Vasilios Fotopoulos; Georgios Basdekis; Konstantinos G Makridis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  From open to arthroscopic anatomical ACL-reconstructions: the long way round. A statement paper.

Authors:  Markus P Arnold; Niklaus F Friederich; Werner Müller; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Anatomical single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael R Carmont; Sven Scheffler; Tim Spalding; Jeremy Brown; Paul M Sutton
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-06

8.  High incidence of partially anatomic tunnel placement in primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Andrea Achtnich; Francesco Ranuccio; Lukas Willinger; Jonas Pogorzelski; Andreas B Imhoff; Sepp Braun; Elmar Herbst
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Knee rotation influences the femoral tunnel angle measurement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 3-dimensional computed tomography model study.

Authors:  Jing Tang; Eric Thorhauer; Chelsea Marsh; Freddie H Fu; Scott Tashman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Preoperative prediction of anterior cruciate ligament tibial footprint size by anthropometric variables.

Authors:  Yong-Beom Park; Chul-Won Ha; Hyung-Joo Kim; Yong-Geun Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.