Literature DB >> 27193008

Preoperative prediction of anterior cruciate ligament tibial footprint size by anthropometric variables.

Yong-Beom Park1, Chul-Won Ha2,3, Hyung-Joo Kim4, Yong-Geun Park5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the ACL tibial footprint size can be predicted by anthropometric variables including height, weight, leg length, femur length, tibia length, and anteroposterior and mediolateral diameters of proximal tibia.
METHODS: This study included 209 out of the 378 eligible patients. The inclusion criterion was ACL with normal gross appearance. Patients with conditions that could have affected the measurement were excluded: torn ACL, osteophyte formation around the ACL tibial attachment, presence of inflammatory arthritis, or history of knee joint infection. According to the above criteria, 169 patients were excluded from this study; 138 had torn ACL, 24 had osteophyte around the ACL footprint, 5 had history of rheumatoid arthritis, and 2 had history of previous knee joint infection. The ACL tibial footprint was carefully dissected and measured during total knee arthroplasty. Anthropometric variables regarding bone lengths were measured on radiography. The association of the ACL tibial footprint size (length and width) with anthropometric variables was analysed using simple and multiple linear regression analyses.
RESULTS: The height, weight, leg length, femur length, tibia length, and the size of proximal tibia were associated with the ACL tibial footprint length and width. The ACL tibial footprint length could be predicted by the equation using tibia length: ACL tibial footprint length = -9.361 + 0.759 * (tibia length in cm) (R 2 = 0.44, P < 0.001) and width by the equation using weight and tibia length: ACL tibial footprint width = -0.5615 + 0.279 * (tibia length in cm) + 0.0333 * (weight in kgs) (R 2 = 0.17, P < 0.001). The concordance correlation coefficient for the measured and predicted values of ACL tibial footprint length and width showed moderate and low agreement, respectively (0.61, 95 % CI 0.53-0.68; 0.30, 95 % CI 0.21-0.38).
CONCLUSION: The ACL tibial footprint length and width are associated with anthropometric variables, especially with tibial length. The predictive equation developed from this study can serve as supplementary guides to determine the surgical techniques and graft options in preoperative planning of an individual ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament; Prediction; Size; Tibial footprint

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27193008     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4164-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  40 in total

1.  Estimation of height from the length of long bones in a Portuguese adult population.

Authors:  M C De Mendonça
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  The correlation between anterior-posterior translation and cross-sectional area of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

Authors:  E S Grood; K A Walz-Hasselfeld; J P Holden; F R Noyes; M S Levy; D L Butler; D W Jackson; D J Drez
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  2D and 3D 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the double bundle structure in anterior cruciate ligament anatomy.

Authors:  Hanno Steckel; Gianluca Vadala; Denise Davis; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Sagittal view of the tibial attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament on magnetic resonance imaging and the relationship between anterior cruciate ligament size and the physical characteristics of patients.

Authors:  Atsushi Ichiba; Hitoji Kido; Fumihito Tokuyama; Kaoru Makuya; Kosaku Oda
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 1.601

5.  Using magnetic resonance imaging to predict adequate graft diameters for autologous hamstring double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Gregory Wernecke; Ian A Harris; Michael T W Houang; Bradley G Seeto; Darren B Chen; Samuel J MacDessi
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  The concept of complete footprint restoration with guidelines for single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Reliability analysis for radiographic measurement of limb length discrepancy: full-length standing anteroposterior radiograph versus scanogram.

Authors:  Sanjeev Sabharwal; Caixia Zhao; John McKeon; Todd Melaghari; Marcia Blacksin; Cornelia Wenekor
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  Intercondylar notch dimensions and graft failure after single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Megan R Wolf; Christopher D Murawski; Floor M van Diek; Carola F van Eck; Yihe Huang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Size variability of the human anterior cruciate ligament insertion sites.

Authors:  Sebastian Kopf; Mathew W Pombo; Michal Szczodry; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry, arthroscopic landmarks, and orientation model for bone tunnel placement.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold; Thomas Ellert; Stefan Metz; Juergen Metz
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  1 in total

1.  Patient Height may Predict the Length of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Ludwig Andribert Powantia Pontoh; Ahmad Jabir Rahyussalim; Jessica Fiolin
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-03-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.