Literature DB >> 22314861

Restoration of the tibial ACL footprint area and geometry using the Modified Insertion Site Table.

Rainer Siebold1, Peter Schuhmacher.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This article is based on the concept of complete footprint restoration. It introduces a "Modified Insertion Site Table" for individual size-matched single- (SB) and double-bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction, which gives surgical guidelines for graft diameters and drill angles according to the restored tibial insertion site area and geometry.
METHODS: Potential graft diameters and drill angles were matched for all individual tibial insertion site lengths between 8 and 21 mm. A "Modified Insertion Site Table" was calculated to achieve a maximum of area restoration of the tibial ACL footprint for each of these insertion site lengths. The geometry of the restored footprint was considered.
RESULTS: A wide ACL footprint up to a 16-mm-long insertion site might be best restored with a SB-, a narrow one with a DB-ACL reconstruction. In a 17-mm-long insertion site, SB- and DB-ACL reconstructions restore a similar amount of footprint area, so geometry considerations of the footprint may decide which surgical technique may be favourized. SB can restore a maximum length of 13.1 mm and DB up to 21 mm. The width of the restored area depends on the drill bit diameter(s) and is larger for SB in most cases. In larger footprints, DB can replicate up to 63% more area and 37% more length than SB-ACL reconstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical footprint restoration requires assessment of the length, width, and the orientation of the tibial ACL insertion site. Both SB- and DB-ACL reconstruction may achieve a wide range of area and geometric restoration of the individual ACL footprint. While SB-ACL reconstruction may be best used for wide insertion sites with up to 16 mm in length, DB-ACL reconstruction has the potential to restore narrow and larger footprints up to 21 mm in length. The "Modified Insertion Site Table" resumes the concept for orientation during surgery

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22314861     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-1899-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  23 in total

1.  Effect of tibial drill angles on bone tunnel aperture during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Sebastian Kopf; Daniel E Martin; Scott Tashman; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Postoperative evaluation of tibial footprint and tunnels characteristics after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with anatomic aimers.

Authors:  Amit Sahasrabudhe; Pascal Christel; Francois Anne; David Appleby; Georges Basdekis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament with regard to its two bundles.

Authors:  Wolf Petersen; Thore Zantop
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The fetal anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic and histologic study.

Authors:  Mario Ferretti; Eric A Levicoff; Trevor A Macpherson; Morey S Moreland; Moises Cohen; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 5.  A systematic review of the femoral origin and tibial insertion morphology of the ACL.

Authors:  Sebastian Kopf; Volker Musahl; Scott Tashman; Michal Szczodry; Wei Shen; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The concept of complete footprint restoration with guidelines for single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament and a rationale for reconstruction.

Authors:  M Odensten; J Gillquist
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament: a blueprint for repair and reconstruction.

Authors:  J A Dodds; S P Arnoczky
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  S P Arnoczky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry, arthroscopic landmarks, and orientation model for bone tunnel placement.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold; Thomas Ellert; Stefan Metz; Juergen Metz
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  11 in total

1.  Commonly used ACL autograft areas do not correlate with the size of the ACL footprint or the femoral condyle.

Authors:  Takanori Iriuchishima; Keinosuke Ryu; Hiroshi Yorifuji; Shin Aizawa; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  The concept of individualized anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Authors:  M Hofbauer; B Muller; C D Murawski; C F van Eck; F H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Risk of Revision Was Not Reduced by a Double-bundle ACL Reconstruction Technique: Results From the Scandinavian Registers.

Authors:  Cathrine Aga; Jüri-Tomas Kartus; Martin Lind; Stein Håkon Låstad Lygre; Lars-Petter Granan; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Anatomic single-bundle ACL surgery: consequences of tibial tunnel diameter and drill-guide angle on tibial footprint coverage.

Authors:  H Van der Bracht; L Verhelst; B Stuyts; B Page; J Bellemans; P Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Single-bundle modified patellar tendon versus double-bundle tibialis anterior allograft ACL reconstruction: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Hui Jun Kang; Xiao Jing Wang; Chun Juan Wu; Jian Hui Cao; Da Hai Yu; Zhi Min Zheng
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Area of the tibial insertion site of the anterior cruciate ligament as a predictor for graft size.

Authors:  Daniel Guenther; Sebastian Irarrázaval; Marcio Albers; Cara Vernacchia; James J Irrgang; Volker Musahl; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Preoperative prediction of anterior cruciate ligament tibial footprint size by anthropometric variables.

Authors:  Yong-Beom Park; Chul-Won Ha; Hyung-Joo Kim; Yong-Geun Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Flat midsubstance of the anterior cruciate ligament with tibial "C"-shaped insertion site.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold; Peter Schuhmacher; Francis Fernandez; Robert Śmigielski; Christian Fink; Axel Brehmer; Joachim Kirsch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Current Concepts and Future Perspective.

Authors:  Christopher D Murawski; Megan R Wolf; Daisuke Araki; Bart Muller; Scott Tashman; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Ribbon like appearance of the midsubstance fibres of the anterior cruciate ligament close to its femoral insertion site: a cadaveric study including 111 knees.

Authors:  Robert Śmigielski; Urszula Zdanowicz; Michał Drwięga; Bogdan Ciszek; Beata Ciszkowska-Łysoń; Rainer Siebold
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.