Literature DB >> 28439635

High incidence of partially anatomic tunnel placement in primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Andrea Achtnich1, Francesco Ranuccio2, Lukas Willinger1, Jonas Pogorzelski1, Andreas B Imhoff3, Sepp Braun1, Elmar Herbst1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate tunnel position and width in failed primary single-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions. It was hypothesized that both femoral and tibial bone tunnels are frequently malplaced in terms of a partially anatomic position in the setting of failed SB ACL reconstruction.
METHODS: Patients with recurrent instability following isolated SB ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts, undergoing revision ACL surgery, were retrospectively included. Further inclusion criteria were age >18 years and availability of preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans and radiographs of the affected knee. Patients with multiligamentous instabilities as well as incomplete or poor radiographs were excluded. Tunnel position was evaluated according to the method described by Harner et al. and Stäubli and Rauschning. Tunnel width was determined on CT scans perpendicular to the bone tunnel axis at three different heights of each bone tunnel.
RESULTS: Eighty-two patients met the inclusion criteria and were considered for radiological analysis. Femoral tunnels were graded as anatomic in 60% (49 of 82) of all cases. In the remaining 40% (33/82), 27% of the tunnels were placed partially anatomic and 13% were graded as non-anatomic. Tibial tunnel placement was found to be anatomic in 54% (44/82) of all cases, partially anatomic in 45% and non-anatomic in 1% of the cases. No statistically significant difference between anatomic or partially anatomic tunnel position and tunnel diameter, neither for the femoral nor for the tibial side, was observed (n.s.).
CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that there is a high incidence of partially anatomic placed tunnels in failed SB ACL reconstruction. Tunnel width was not associated with tunnel position. Clinically, partially anatomic bone tunnels frequently require a staged procedure with bone grafting and subsequent ACL revision surgery. Thus, surgeons should carefully analyse tunnel position and width preoperatively to properly plan ACL revision surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; Anatomic; Anterior cruciate; Knee; Ligament reconstruction; Revision; Single-bundle; Tunnel placement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28439635     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4555-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  51 in total

1.  [Arthroscopic filling of malplaced and enlarged drill tunnels with iliac crest spongiosa in recurrent instability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].

Authors:  T Zantop; W Petersen
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Transtibial versus low anteromedial portal drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a radiographic study of femoral tunnel position.

Authors:  Cecilia Pascual-Garrido; Britta L Swanson; Kyle E Swanson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Transtibial versus anteromedial portal reaming in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an anatomic and biomechanical evaluation of surgical technique.

Authors:  Asheesh Bedi; Volker Musahl; Volker Steuber; Daniel Kendoff; Dan Choi; Answorth A Allen; Andrew D Pearle; David W Altchek
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Conventional over-the-top-aiming devices with short offset fail to hit the center of the human femoral ACL footprint in medial portal technique, whereas medial-portal-aiming devices with larger offset hit the center reliably.

Authors:  Christoph Domnick; Mirco Herbort; Michael J Raschke; Susanne Bremer; Benedikt Schliemann; Wolf Petersen; Thore Zantop
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Clinical outcome of anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction and 3D CT model-based validation of femoral socket aperture position.

Authors:  Shuji Taketomi; Hiroshi Inui; Kensuke Nakamura; Jinso Hirota; Takaki Sanada; Hironari Masuda; Hideki Takeda; Sakae Tanaka; Takumi Nakagawa
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.

Authors:  M H Getelman; M J Friedman
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 7.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Christina R Allen; J Robert Giffin; Christopher D Harner
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.472

8.  [Anatomic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in single bundle technique].

Authors:  W Petersen; P Forkel; A Achtnich; S Metzlaff; T Zantop
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.154

9.  Simplified MRI sequences for postoperative control of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  J D Agneskirchner; M Galla; P Landwehr; H P Lobenhoffer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: endoscopic versus two-incision technique.

Authors:  C D Harner; P H Marks; F H Fu; J J Irrgang; M B Silby; R Mengato
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of Inside-Out and Outside-In Methods of Femoral Tunnel Preparation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Using 3D-CT.

Authors:  Abhinay Vadlamudi; Amit Kale; Jaiman Sharma; Vishal Patil; Mukund Pai
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-21

Review 2.  Revision ACL Reconstruction: Principles and Practice.

Authors:  Sachin Tapasvi; Anshu Shekhar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 1.251

3.  [Mid-term effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament revision].

Authors:  Xing Yun; Yu Wei; Zhongli Li; Yujie Liu; Zhigang Wang; Qiang Zhang; Yang Liu; Min Wei
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-01-15

4.  Computed Tomography Assessment of Anatomic Graft Placement After ACL Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Grid and Angle Measurements.

Authors:  Anagha P Parkar; Miraude E A P M Adriaensen; Lasse M Giil; Eirik Solheim
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-03-19

5.  Increase in cartilage degeneration in all knee compartments after failed ACL reconstruction at 4 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Kathleen Andrä; Robert Prill; Enes Kayaalp; Lars Irlenbusch; Eckehard Liesaus; Tilo Trommer; Peter Ullmann; Roland Becker
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2021-12-16

6.  One-Stage ACL Revision Using a Bone Allograft Plug for a Semianatomic Tibial Tunnel That Is Too Anterior.

Authors:  Corentin Philippe; Vincent Marot; Louis Courtot; Timothée Mesnier; Nicolas Reina; Etienne Cavaignac
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-02-28

7.  Posteriorly positioned femoral grafts decrease long-term failure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, femoral and tibial graft positions did not affect long-term reported outcome.

Authors:  Tim T C R de Mees; Max Reijman; Jan Hendrik Waarsing; Duncan E Meuffels
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 4.114

8.  3-Dimensional Printed Models May Be a Useful Tool When Planning Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Gene Kitamura; Marcio Bottene Villa Albers; Bryson P Lesniak; Stephen Joseph Rabuck; Volker Musahl; Carol L Andrews; Anish Ghodadra; Freddie Fu
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-09-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.