Literature DB >> 23589127

Knee rotation influences the femoral tunnel angle measurement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 3-dimensional computed tomography model study.

Jing Tang1, Eric Thorhauer, Chelsea Marsh, Freddie H Fu, Scott Tashman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Femoral tunnel angle (FTA) has been proposed as a metric for evaluating whether ACL reconstruction was performed anatomically. In clinic, radiographic images are typically acquired with an uncertain amount of internal/external knee rotation. The extent to which knee rotation will influence FTA measurement is unclear. Furthermore, differences in FTA measurement between the two common positions (0° and 45° knee flexion) have not been established. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of knee rotation on FTA measurement after ACL reconstruction.
METHODS: Knee CT data from 16 subjects were segmented to produce 3D bone models. Central axes of tunnels were identified. The 0° and 45° flexion angles were simulated. Knee internal/external rotations were simulated in a range of ± 20°. FTA was defined as the angle between the tunnel axis and femoral shaft axis, orthogonally projected into the coronal plane.
RESULTS: Femoral tunnel angle was positively/negatively correlated with knee rotation angle at 0°/45° knee flexion. At 0° knee flexion, FTA for anterio-medial (AM) tunnels was significantly decreased at 20° of external knee rotation. At 45° knee flexion, more than 16° external or 19° internal rotation significantly altered FTA measurements for single-bundle tunnels; smaller rotations (± 9° for AM, ± 5° for PL) created significant errors in FTA measurements after double-bundle reconstruction.
CONCLUSION: Femoral tunnel angle measurements were correlated with knee rotation. Relatively small imaging malalignment introduced significant errors with knee flexed 45°. This study supports using the 0° flexion position for knee radiographs to reduce errors in FTA measurement due to knee internal/external rotation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23589127      PMCID: PMC3883895          DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2504-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  25 in total

1.  Effect of alignment of the medial tibial plateau and x-ray beam on apparent progression of osteoarthritis in the standing anteroposterior knee radiograph.

Authors:  S A Mazzuca; K D Brandt; P A Dieppe; M Doherty; B P Katz; K A Lane
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-08

2.  Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Masayoshi Yagi; Eric K Wong; Akihiro Kanamori; Richard E Debski; Freddie H Fu; Savio L-Y Woo
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  The location of femoral and tibial tunnels in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction analyzed by three-dimensional computed tomography models.

Authors:  Brian Forsythe; Sebastian Kopf; Andrew K Wong; Cesar A Q Martins; William Anderst; Scott Tashman; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Double-bundle "anatomic" anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study of tunnel positioning with a transtibial technique.

Authors:  Francesco Giron; Pierluigi Cuomo; Andrew Edwards; Anthony M J Bull; Andrew A Amis; Paolo Aglietti
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study.

Authors:  Timo Järvelä
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Double-bundle ACL reconstruction can improve rotational stability.

Authors:  Masayoshi Yagi; Ryosuke Kuroda; Kouki Nagamune; Shinichi Yoshiya; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Postoperative evaluation of femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction: plain radiography versus computed tomography.

Authors:  Christian Hoser; Katja Tecklenburg; Karl Heinz Kuenzel; Christian Fink
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-01-29       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Foot rotational effects on radiographic measures of lower limb alignment.

Authors:  Michael A Hunt; Peter J Fowler; Trevor B Birmingham; Thomas R Jenkyn; J Robert Giffin
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures.

Authors:  Kazunori Yasuda; Eiji Kondo; Hiroki Ichiyama; Yoshie Tanabe; Harukazu Tohyama
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  A mathematical analysis of the effect of flexion and rotation on apparent varus/valgus alignment at the knee.

Authors:  K A Krackow; C L Pepe; E J Galloway
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  2 in total

1.  Does radiographic location ensure precise anatomic location of the femoral fixation site in medial patellofemoral ligament surgery?

Authors:  Vicente Sanchis-Alfonso; Cristina Ramirez-Fuentes; Erik Montesinos-Berry; Francisco Aparisi-Rodriguez; Luis Martí-Bonmatí
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Influence of axial limb rotation on radiographic lower limb alignment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marc-Daniel Ahrend; Heiko Baumgartner; Christoph Ihle; Tina Histing; Steffen Schröter; Felix Finger
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.928

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.