Literature DB >> 17216271

Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study.

Timo Järvelä1.   

Abstract

Anatomical observation and biomechanical studies have shown that the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) mainly consists of two distinct bundles, the anteromedial (AM) bundle and posterolateral (PL) bundle. Conventional single-bundle ACL reconstruction techniques have focused on the restoration of the AM bundle while giving limited attention to the PL bundle. The purpose of this prospective, randomized clinical study is to compare the outcomes of ACL reconstruction when using either double-bundle or single-bundle technique and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation, and similar rehabilitation with both techniques. Sixty-five patients were randomized into either double-bundle (n = 35) or single-bundle (n = 30) ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendons and bioabsorbable screw (Hexalon, Inion Company, Tampere, Finland) fixation in both groups. The evaluation methods were clinical examination, KT-1000 arthrometer measurements, radiographic evaluation, as well as International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm knee scores. There were no differences between the study groups preoperatively. For an average of 14 months of follow-up (range 12-20 months), 30 patients of the double-bundle group and 29 patients of the single-bundle group were available (91%). At the follow-up, the rotational stability, as evaluated by pivot shift test, was significantly better in the double-bundle group than in the single-bundle group. However, in anterior stability of the knee, there was no significant difference between the groups. None of the patients in the double-bundle group had graft failure, while four patients in the single-bundle group had. In addition, knee scores were equal at the follow-up, and all the results were significantly better at the follow-up than preoperatively, in both groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17216271     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-006-0254-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  26 in total

1.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using a double bundle.

Authors:  K Hara; T Kubo; T Suginoshita; C Shimizu; Y Hirasawa
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Single- versus bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous multiple-stranded hamstring tendons with endoButton femoral fixation: A prospective study.

Authors:  M Hamada; K Shino; S Horibe; T Mitsuoka; T Miyama; Y Shiozaki; T Mae
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O'Connor Award paper.

Authors:  John C Loh; Yukihisa Fukuda; Eiichi Tsuda; Richard J Steadman; Freddie H Fu; Savio L Y Woo
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  A five-year comparison of patellar tendon versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Leo A Pinczewski; David J Deehan; Lucy J Salmon; Vivianne J Russell; Amanda Clingeleffer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of bioabsorbable interference screw and endobutton-post fixation.

Authors:  C Benjamin Ma; Kimberly Francis; Jeffrey Towers; Jay Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Christopher H Harner
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Single- versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons.

Authors:  N Adachi; M Ochi; Y Uchio; J Iwasa; M Kuriwaka; Y Ito
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-05

7.  Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts.

Authors:  Kazunori Yasuda; Eiji Kondo; Hiroki Ichiyama; Nobuto Kitamura; Yoshie Tanabe; Harukazu Tohyama; Akio Minami
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee.

Authors:  D M Daniel; L L Malcom; G Losse; M L Stone; R Sachs; R Burks
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Double-bundle anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-hamstring-bone composite graft.

Authors:  Ryohei Takeuchi; Tomoyuki Saito; Sigeyuki Mituhashi; Eiichi Suzuki; Ikufumi Yamada; Tomihisa Koshino
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee using a doubled tendon graft.

Authors:  B Zaricznyj
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  102 in total

Review 1.  Pivot shift as an outcome measure for ACL reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Olufemi R Ayeni; Manraj Chahal; Michael N Tran; Sheila Sprague
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Can the pivot-shift be eliminated by anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Authors:  Stefano Zaffagnini; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Nicola Lopomo; Cecilia Signorelli; Tommaso Bonanzinga; Costanza Musiani; Papakonstantinou Vassilis; Marco Nitri; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  A new quantitative method for pivot shift grading.

Authors:  S Kopf; R Kauert; J Halfpaap; T Jung; R Becker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Double-bundle reconstruction results in superior clinical outcome than single-bundle reconstruction.

Authors:  Ying Zhu; Ren-Kuan Tang; Peng Zhao; Shi-Sheng Zhu; Yong-Guo Li; Jian-Bo Li
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The anatomic approach to primary, revision and augmentation anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Carola F van Eck; Verena M Schreiber; T Thomas Liu; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Postoperative evaluation of tibial footprint and tunnels characteristics after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with anatomic aimers.

Authors:  Amit Sahasrabudhe; Pascal Christel; Francois Anne; David Appleby; Georges Basdekis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Avoiding tunnel collisions between fibular collateral ligament and ACL posterolateral bundle reconstruction.

Authors:  Lawrence Camarda; Michele D'Arienzo; Giovanni Palermo Patera; Leone Filosto; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  MRI of double-bundle ACL reconstruction: evaluation of graft findings.

Authors:  Tommi Kiekara; Timo Järvelä; Heini Huhtala; Antti Paakkala
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 9.  Clinically relevant anatomy and what anatomic reconstruction means.

Authors:  Robert F LaPrade; Samuel G Moulton; Marco Nitri; Werner Mueller; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Knee rotation influences the femoral tunnel angle measurement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 3-dimensional computed tomography model study.

Authors:  Jing Tang; Eric Thorhauer; Chelsea Marsh; Freddie H Fu; Scott Tashman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.