Literature DB >> 16581446

Cadaveric knee observation study for describing anatomic femoral tunnel placement for two-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Tomoyuki Mochizuki1, Takeshi Muneta, Tsuyoshi Nagase, Shin-Ichi Shirasawa, Kei-Ich Akita, Ichiro Sekiya.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The recently developed 2-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction lacks sufficient anatomic background. The purpose of this anatomic study was to describe functional anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) portions of the natural ACL and to provide a reproducible description of the graft placement. Our hypothesis was that the core functional area of the femoral ACL attachment will be revealed by removing the surface fibrous membranous tissue of the ACL midsubstance and the attachment area.
METHODS: The natural ACL was divided into 2 portions of AM and PL bundles in a flexion position; those bundles were most clearly defined when the knee was in flexion. The surface membrane of the ACL was removed and the margin was marked. The attachment site was removed after documenting its measurements. The knee position was corrected by digital photographs with the femoral bone in the correct lateral position.
RESULTS: The length of the major axis of the AM and PL bundles averaged 9.2 +/- 0.7 mm and 6.0 +/-0.8 mm, respectively. Both lengths of the minor axis of AM and PL bundles averaged 4.7 +/-0.6 mm. The distance from the attachment center of each AM and PL bundle to the posterior bone and articular surface border averaged 6.3 +/- 0.6 mm and 8.6 +/- 0.6 mm, respectively. The center of the AM and PL bundles was described as 1:40 and 3:10 clock positions, respectively, as left knee when the point was defined on the "lateral wall clock" of the intercondylar notch.
CONCLUSIONS: The study described the position and area of each 2-bundle of AM and PL portions of the natural ACL by describing its central structure with the surface membrane removed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The detailed anatomic description of the natural ACL femoral attachment might suggest to surgeons where to make femoral tunnels during 2-bundle reconstruction.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16581446     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.09.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  64 in total

1.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: drilling a femoral posterolateral tunnel cannot be accomplished using an over-the-top step-off drill guide.

Authors:  Sven Behrendt; Jens Richter
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Flat ACL anatomy: fact no fiction.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction: a literature review.

Authors:  Charles Crawford; John Nyland; Sarah Landes; Richard Jackson; Haw Chong Chang; Akbar Nawab; David N M Caborn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The attachments of the anteromedial and posterolateral fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament. Part 2: femoral attachment.

Authors:  Andrew Edwards; Anthony M J Bull; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The effect of intra-operative knee flexion angle on determination of graft location in the anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yuichi Hoshino; Kouki Nagamune; Masayoshi Yagi; Daisuke Araki; Koji Nishimoto; Seiji Kubo; Doita Minoru; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  A systematic review of the femoral origin and tibial insertion morphology of the ACL.

Authors:  Sebastian Kopf; Volker Musahl; Scott Tashman; Michal Szczodry; Wei Shen; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Comparison of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and single-bundle reconstruction with remnant pull-out suture.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Kim; Young Bok Jung; Min Ku Song; Sang Hak Lee; Ho Joong Jung; Han Jun Lee; Hyoung Seok Jung; Hawa-Tahir Siti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Three-dimensional computed tomography evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament footprint for anatomic single-bundle reconstruction.

Authors:  Guilherme Moreira de Abreu-e-Silva; Mcbrite H G Castro Nunes de Oliveira; Gustavo Silame Maranhão; Lucas de Melo Castro Deligne; Rudolf Moreira Pfeilsticker; Eduardo Nilo Vasconcellos Novais; Tarcizo Afonso Nunes; Marco Antônio Percope de Andrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Effect of femoral tunnel position on graft tension curves and knee stability in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Hideyuki Koga; Takeshi Muneta; Kazuyoshi Yagishita; Toshifumi Watanabe; Tomoyuki Mochizuki; Masafumi Horie; Tomomasa Nakamura; Ichiro Sekiya
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Radiological evaluation for conflict of the femoral tunnel entrance area prior to anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery.

Authors:  Philippe M Tscholl; Roland M Biedert; Imre Gal
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.