Literature DB >> 9566331

Diotic and dichotic detection using multiplied-noise maskers.

S van de Par1, A Kohlrausch.   

Abstract

Detection thresholds were measured with a multiplied-noise masker that was in phase in both ears and a sinusoidal signal which was either in phase or out of phase (NoSo and NoS pi conditions). The masker was generated by multiplying a low-pass noise with a sinusoidal carrier. The signal was a sinusoid with the same frequency as the carrier and a constant phase offset, theta, with respect to the carrier. By adjusting the phase offset, the stimulus properties were varied in such a way that only interaural time delays (theta = pi/2) or interaural intensity differences (theta = 0) were present within the NoS pi stimulus. Thresholds were measured at a center frequency of 4 kHz as a function of bandwidth for theta = pi/2 and for theta = 0. In a second experiment thresholds were measured for a bandwidth of 25 Hz as a function of the center frequency. The results show that narrow-band BMLDs at 4 kHz can amount to 30 dB for the theta = 0 condition. For this condition, narrow-band BMLDs are also reasonably constant across frequency, in contrast to results obtained with standard Gaussian-noise maskers. For theta = pi/2, BMLDs are restricted to the frequency region below 2 kHz provided that the masker is narrow band, but BMLDs of up to 15 dB are found at 4 kHz if the masker is 50 Hz or wider. The frequency dependence of the binaural thresholds seems to be best explained by assuming that the stimulus waveforms are compressed before binaural interaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9566331     DOI: 10.1121/1.421356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

1.  Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence. IV. The effect of compression on stimulus statistics.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  How sensitivity to ongoing interaural temporal disparities is affected by manipulations of temporal features of the envelopes of high-frequency stimuli.

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Diotic and dichotic detection with reproducible chimeric stimuli.

Authors:  Sean A Davidson; Robert H Gilkey; H Steven Colburn; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The role of envelope statistics in detecting changes in interaural correlation.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Interaural correlation fails to account for detection in a classic binaural task: dynamic ITDs dominate N0Spi detection.

Authors:  Marcel van der Heijden; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-17

6.  Functional anatomy of the masking level difference, an fMRI study.

Authors:  David S Wack; Jennifer L Cox; Claudiu V Schirda; Christopher R Magnano; Joan E Sussman; Donald Henderson; Robert F Burkard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.