Literature DB >> 21173864

Unmasking the acoustic effects of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: A statistical modeling approach.

Jennifer Cole1, Gary Linebaugh, Cheyenne Munson, Bob McMurray.   

Abstract

Coarticulation is a source of acoustic variability for vowels, but how large is this effect relative to other sources of variance? We investigate acoustic effects of anticipatory V-to-V coarticulation relative to variation due to the following C and individual speaker. We examine F1 and F2 from V1 in 48 V1-C#V2 contexts produced by 10 speakers of American English. ANOVA reveals significant effects of both V2 and C on F1 and F2 measures of V1. The influence of V2 and C on acoustic variability relative to that of speaker and target vowel identity is evaluated using hierarchical linear regression. Speaker and target vowel account for roughly 80% of the total variance in F1 and F2, but when this variance is partialed out C and V2 account for another 18% (F1) and 63% (F2) of the remaining target vowel variability. Multinomial logistic regression (MLR) models are constructed to test the power of target vowel F1 and F2 for predicting C and V2 of the upcoming context. Prediction accuracy is 58% for C-Place, 76% for C-Voicing and 54% for V2, but only when variance due to other sources is factored out. MLR is discussed as a model of the parsing mechanism in speech perception.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21173864      PMCID: PMC3003261          DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2009.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phon        ISSN: 0095-4470


  21 in total

1.  A study of F1 coarticulation in VCV sequences.

Authors:  D Recasens; M D Pallarès
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  An EMA study of VCV coarticulatory direction.

Authors:  Daniel Recasens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The role of contrast in limiting vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in different languages.

Authors:  S Y Manuel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  An EMA/EPG study of vowel-to-vowel articulation across velars in Southern British English.

Authors:  Janet Fletcher
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2004 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 1.346

5.  Speech perception as pattern recognition.

Authors:  T M Nearey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Cues to lexical choice: discriminating place and voice.

Authors:  P Warren; W Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-01

7.  Perception of anticipatory coarticulation effects.

Authors:  J G Martin; H T Bunnell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Segmentation of coarticulated speech in perception.

Authors:  C A Fowler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-10

9.  Articulatory rate and perceptual constancy in phonetic perception.

Authors:  Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Tracking the time course of phonetic cue integration during spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Meghan A Clayards; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-12
View more
  20 in total

1.  Contingent categorization in speech perception.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Natasha Bullock-Rest; Ariane E Rhone; Allard Jongman; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.331

Review 2.  What Acoustic Studies Tell Us About Vowels in Developing and Disordered Speech.

Authors:  Ray D Kent; Carrie Rountrey
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  The time-course of speaking rate compensation: Effects of sentential rate and vowel length on voicing judgments.

Authors:  Joseph C Toscano; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.331

4.  Metrical expectations from preceding prosody influence perception of lexical stress.

Authors:  Meredith Brown; Anne Pier Salverda; Laura C Dilley; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Finding the signal by adding noise: The role of noncontrastive phonetic variability in early word learning.

Authors:  Gwyneth C Rost; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2010-11-01

6.  What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Allard Jongman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Listeners can anticipate future segments before they identify the current one.

Authors:  Kayleen E Schreiber; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  What Are You Waiting For? Real-Time Integration of Cues for Fricatives Suggests Encapsulated Auditory Memory.

Authors:  Marcus E Galle; Jamie Klein-Packard; Kayleen Schreiber; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-01

9.  Immediate effects of anticipatory coarticulation in spoken-word recognition.

Authors:  Anne Pier Salverda; Dave Kleinschmidt; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  Variability in English vowels is comparable in articulation and acoustics.

Authors:  Aude Noiray; Khalil Iskarous; D H Whalen
Journal:  Lab Phonol       Date:  2014-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.