Literature DB >> 25621583

Metrical expectations from preceding prosody influence perception of lexical stress.

Meredith Brown1, Anne Pier Salverda1, Laura C Dilley2, Michael K Tanenhaus1.   

Abstract

Two visual-world experiments tested the hypothesis that expectations based on preceding prosody influence the perception of suprasegmental cues to lexical stress. The results demonstrate that listeners' consideration of competing alternatives with different stress patterns (e.g., 'jury/gi'raffe) can be influenced by the fundamental frequency and syllable timing patterns across material preceding a target word. When preceding stressed syllables distal to the target word shared pitch and timing characteristics with the first syllable of the target word, pictures of alternatives with primary lexical stress on the first syllable (e.g., jury) initially attracted more looks than alternatives with unstressed initial syllables (e.g., giraffe). This effect was modulated when preceding unstressed syllables had pitch and timing characteristics similar to the initial syllable of the target word, with more looks to alternatives with unstressed initial syllables (e.g., giraffe) than to those with stressed initial syllables (e.g., jury). These findings suggest that expectations about the acoustic realization of upcoming speech include information about metrical organization and lexical stress and that these expectations constrain the initial interpretation of suprasegmental stress cues. These distal prosody effects implicate online probabilistic inferences about the sources of acoustic-phonetic variation during spoken-word recognition. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25621583      PMCID: PMC4380594          DOI: 10.1037/a0038689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  43 in total

1.  An oscillatory hierarchy controlling neuronal excitability and stimulus processing in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Peter Lakatos; Ankoor S Shah; Kevin H Knuth; Istvan Ulbert; George Karmos; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Tracking the what and why of speakers' choices: prosodic boundaries and the length of constituents.

Authors:  Charles Clifton; Katy Carlson; Lyn Frazier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

3.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension.

Authors:  Roger Levy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-07-30

4.  F0-based rhythm effects on the perception of local syllable prominence.

Authors:  Oliver Niebuhr
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  Effects of lexical stress in auditory word recognition.

Authors:  L M Slowiaczek
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1990 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.500

6.  Speaking rate affects the perception of duration as a suprasegmental lexical-stress cue.

Authors:  Eva Reinisch; Alexandra Jesse; James M McQueen
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.500

Review 7.  How to grow a mind: statistics, structure, and abstraction.

Authors:  Joshua B Tenenbaum; Charles Kemp; Thomas L Griffiths; Noah D Goodman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference.

Authors:  G T Altmann; Y Kamide
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-12-17

10.  Interpreting prosodic cues in discourse context.

Authors:  Meredith Brown; Anne Pier Salverda; Christine Gunlogson; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.331

View more
  7 in total

1.  English Listeners Use Suprasegmental Cues to Lexical Stress Early During Spoken-Word Recognition.

Authors:  Alexandra Jesse; Katja Poellmann; Ying-Yee Kong
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  What you hear first, is what you get: Initial metrical cue presentation modulates syllable detection in sentence processing.

Authors:  Anna Fiveash; Simone Falk; Barbara Tillmann
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Rhythmic and speech rate effects in the perception of durational cues.

Authors:  Jeremy Steffman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Word Recall is Affected by Surrounding Metrical Context.

Authors:  Amelia E Kimball; Loretta K Yiu; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.331

Review 5.  The Temporal Prediction of Stress in Speech and Its Relation to Musical Beat Perception.

Authors:  Eleonora J Beier; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-03

6.  Differential contributions of synaptic and intrinsic inhibitory currents to speech segmentation via flexible phase-locking in neural oscillators.

Authors:  Benjamin R Pittman-Polletta; Yangyang Wang; David A Stanley; Charles E Schroeder; Miles A Whittington; Nancy J Kopell
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 7.  A Hierarchical Generative Framework of Language Processing: Linking Language Perception, Interpretation, and Production Abnormalities in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Meredith Brown; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.