Literature DB >> 31087271

Listeners can anticipate future segments before they identify the current one.

Kayleen E Schreiber1, Bob McMurray2.   

Abstract

Speech unfolds rapidly over time, and the information necessary to recognize even a single phoneme may not be available simultaneously. Consequently, listeners must both integrate prior acoustic cues and anticipate future segments. Prior work on stop consonants and vowels suggests that listeners integrate asynchronous cues by partially activating lexical entries as soon as any information is available, and then updating this when later cues arrive. However, a recent study suggests that for the voiceless sibilant fricatives (/s/ and /ʃ/), listeners wait to initiate lexical access until all cues have arrived at the onset of the vowel. Sibilants also contain coarticulatory cues that could be used to anticipate the vowel upcoming. However, given these results, it is unclear if listeners could use them fast enough to speed vowel recognition. The current study examines anticipation by asking when listeners use coarticulatory information in the frication to predict the upcoming vowel. A visual world paradigm experiment found that listeners do not wait: they anticipate the vowel immediately from the onset of the frication, even as they wait several hundred milliseconds to identify the fricative. This finding suggests listeners do not strictly process phonemes in the order that they appear; rather the dynamics of language processing may be largely internal and only loosely coupled to the dynamics of the input.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticipation; Coarticulation; Cue integrationm Auditory memory; Speech perception; Spoken word recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31087271      PMCID: PMC6688751          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01712-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  62 in total

Review 1.  Hierarchical categorization of coarticulated phonemes: a theoretical analysis.

Authors:  R Smits
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-10

2.  Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives.

Authors:  A Jongman; R Wayland; S Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Speech perception.

Authors:  Randy L Diehl; Andrew J Lotto; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Unfolding of phonetic information over time: a database of Dutch diphone perception.

Authors:  Roel Smits; Natasha Warner; James M McQueen; Anne Cutler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Feature parsing: feature cue mapping in spoken word recognition.

Authors:  David W Gow
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-05

6.  Picking up speed in understanding: Speech processing efficiency and vocabulary growth across the 2nd year.

Authors:  Anne Fernald; Amy Perfors; Virginia A Marchman
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2006-01

7.  Formant transitions in fricative identification: the role of native fricative inventory.

Authors:  Anita Wagner; Mirjam Ernestus; Anne Cutler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data.

Authors:  Eric Maris; Robert Oostenveld
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues.

Authors:  Meghan Clayards; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin; Robert A Jacobs
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-06-25

10.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference.

Authors:  G T Altmann; Y Kamide
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-12-17
View more
  1 in total

1.  Gradient activation of speech categories facilitates listeners' recovery from lexical garden paths, but not perception of speech-in-noise.

Authors:  Efthymia C Kapnoula; Jan Edwards; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 3.077

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.