Literature DB >> 21169576

Single-letter coloring and spatial cuing do not eliminate or reduce a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.

Maria Augustinova1, Valentin Flaudias, Ludovic Ferrand.   

Abstract

The automaticity of semantic activation in the Stroop task is still the subject of considerable debate (Augustinova & Ferrand, 2007; Manwell, Roberts, & Besner, 2004). The present experiments were designed to assess whether coloring and cuing a single letter (vs. all letters) in the Stroop task reliably eliminates semantically based Stroop interference or whether the elimination observed by Manwell et al. was due to insufficient statistical power. Experiment 1 was an exact replication of the experiment conducted by Manwell and colleagues and involved a large population. Experiment 2 replicated and extended Experiment 1 by controlling for initial fixation. In line with previous findings obtained by Augustinova and Ferrand, both experiments indicated that coloring and cuing a single letter failed to eliminate or even reduce the semantically based Stroop effect. Thus, these results add to the growing body of evidence suggesting that semantic activation in the Stroop task is automatic.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21169576     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.6.827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  16 in total

1.  Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition "automatic"?

Authors:  Tracy L Brown; Christopher L Gore; Thomas H Carr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-06

2.  When are morphemic and semantic priming observed in visual word recognition?

Authors:  Christa Macnevin; Derek Besner
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2002-06

3.  What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect?

Authors:  D Besner; J A Stolz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

4.  DMDX: a windows display program with millisecond accuracy.

Authors:  Kenneth I Forster; Jonathan C Forster
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-02

5.  Single letter coloring and spatial cuing eliminates a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Laurie A Manwell; Martha Anne Roberts; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

Review 6.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review.

Authors:  C M MacLeod
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Automatic semantic activation is no myth: semantic context effects on the N400 in the letter-search task in the absence of response time effects.

Authors:  Martin Heil; Bettina Rolke; Anna Pecchinenda
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-12

8.  Congruency effects in the letter search task: semantic activation in the absence of priming.

Authors:  Keith A Hutchison; Frank A Bosco
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-04

9.  The stroop effect and the myth of automaticity.

Authors:  D Besner; J A Stolz; C Boutilier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

10.  Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: testing the limits of involuntary word processing.

Authors:  Tracy L Brown; Kelly Joneleit; Cathy S Robinson; Carli Rose Brown
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  2002
View more
  13 in total

1.  Suggestion does not de-automatize word reading: evidence from the semantically based Stroop task.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

2.  Is semantic activation from print capacity limited? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.

Authors:  Derek Besner; Michael Reynolds
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

3.  Behavioral and electrophysiological investigation of semantic and response conflict in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; Laetitia Silvert; Ludovic Ferrand; Pierre Michel Llorca; Valentin Flaudias
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

4.  The semantic Stroop effect: An ex-Gaussian analysis.

Authors:  Darcy White; Evan F Risko; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

5.  Some further clarifications on age-related differences in Stroop interference.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; David Clarys; Nicolas Spatola; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04

6.  The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention.

Authors:  Sachiko Kinoshita; Luke Mills; Dennis Norris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Differential effects of viewing positions on standard versus semantic Stroop interference.

Authors:  Ludovic Ferrand; Maria Augustinova
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

8.  Automaticity revisited: when print doesn't activate semantics.

Authors:  Elsa M Labuschagne; Derek Besner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-10

9.  Independent processing of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response conflicts.

Authors:  Qi Li; Weizhi Nan; Kai Wang; Xun Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Stroop interference in a delayed match-to-sample task: evidence for semantic competition.

Authors:  Bradley R Sturz; Marshall L Green; Lawrence Locker; Ty W Boyer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.