Literature DB >> 15376795

Single letter coloring and spatial cuing eliminates a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.

Laurie A Manwell1, Martha Anne Roberts, Derek Besner.   

Abstract

Previous work has shown that the Stroop effect is reduced in size when a single letter is colored and spatially precued. The present experiment addresses a number of criticisms of this work by (1) providing a direct measure of semantic processing, (2) using a vocal response instead of a manual one, and (3) using a more appropriate baseline. A semantically based Stroop effect (slower color naming for color-associated words than for color-neutral words) is observed when all letters in the display are precued and appear in a homogeneous color. This Stroop effect is statistically eliminated when a single letter is precued and is the "odd man out" in terms of its color. Two explanations are considered. In one, single-letter coloring and cuing serve to curtail semantic processing. In the other, single-letter coloring and cuing help to keep the informational sources (i.e, color, word) separate and hence reduce interference, but semantic analysis is not curtailed. The latter account provides a more complete account of existing data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15376795     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  19 in total

1.  Modulating semantic feedback in visual word recognition.

Authors:  M C Smith; D Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

2.  Visual attention and word recognition in stroop color naming: is word recognition "automatic"?

Authors:  Tracy L Brown; Christopher L Gore; Thomas H Carr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-06

3.  When are morphemic and semantic priming observed in visual word recognition?

Authors:  Christa Macnevin; Derek Besner
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2002-06

4.  What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect?

Authors:  D Besner; J A Stolz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

5.  Priming effects that span an intervening unrelated word: implications for models of memory representation and retrieval.

Authors:  S Joordens; D Besner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Basic processes in reading: is visual word recognition obligatory?

Authors:  Evan F Risko; Jennifer A Stolz; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

7.  Levels of representation in visual word recognition: a dissociation between morphological and semantic processing.

Authors:  J A Stolz; D Besner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The stroop effect and the myth of automaticity.

Authors:  D Besner; J A Stolz; C Boutilier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

9.  The relationship between contextual facilitation and depth of processing.

Authors:  M C Smith; L Theodor; P E Franklin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: testing the limits of involuntary word processing.

Authors:  Tracy L Brown; Kelly Joneleit; Cathy S Robinson; Carli Rose Brown
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  2002
View more
  19 in total

1.  Suggestion does not de-automatize word reading: evidence from the semantically based Stroop task.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

2.  Single-letter coloring and spatial cuing do not eliminate or reduce a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; Valentin Flaudias; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-12

3.  Depth cues do not underlie attentional modulations of the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Peter Wühr; Martina Weltle
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-06

4.  Congruency effects in the letter search task: semantic activation in the absence of priming.

Authors:  Keith A Hutchison; Frank A Bosco
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-04

5.  On the immunity of perceptual implicit memory to manipulations of attention.

Authors:  Ben R Newell; Tamara Cavenett; Sally Andrews
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-06

6.  Stroop effects on redemption and semantic effects on confession: simultaneous automatic activation of embedded and carrier words.

Authors:  Cristina Iani; Remo Job; Roberto Padovani; Roberto Nicoletti
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-03-20

7.  The eyes fixate the optimal viewing position of task-irrelevant words.

Authors:  Daniel Smilek; Grayden J F Solman; Peter Murawski; Jonathan S A Carriere
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

8.  Is semantic activation from print capacity limited? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.

Authors:  Derek Besner; Michael Reynolds
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

9.  Behavioral and electrophysiological investigation of semantic and response conflict in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; Laetitia Silvert; Ludovic Ferrand; Pierre Michel Llorca; Valentin Flaudias
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

10.  The semantic Stroop effect: An ex-Gaussian analysis.

Authors:  Darcy White; Evan F Risko; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.