Literature DB >> 25092389

Behavioral and electrophysiological investigation of semantic and response conflict in the Stroop task.

Maria Augustinova1, Laetitia Silvert, Ludovic Ferrand, Pierre Michel Llorca, Valentin Flaudias.   

Abstract

By combining the semantic Stroop paradigm (e.g., Klein in American Journal of Psychology 77:576-588, 1964) with a single-letter coloring (SLC) procedure (e.g., Besner et al. in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4:221-225, 1997), this research investigated whether the frequently reported Stroop-related event-related potential (ERP) effect arising about 400 ms after stimulus onset (Ninc) is sensitive to the semantic and/or the response conflict. Consistent with our past findings (e.g., Augustinova et al. in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17:827-833, 2010), SLC speeded up reaction times for standard-incongruent items only, indicating that SLC reduced the response conflict that these (but not color-associated and neutral) items involve. Ninc amplitudes were more negative for standard-incongruent and color-associated than for color-neutral items. Importantly, this difference was not modulated by SLC. Hence, the behavioral and ERP results conjointly suggest that the Stroop-related Ninc is sensitive to semantic rather than to response and/or general conflict.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25092389     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0697-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  16 in total

1.  Coloring single stroop elements: reducing automaticity or slowing color processing?

Authors:  J S Monahan
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  2001-01

2.  An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect.

Authors:  M Liotti; M G Woldorff; R Perez; H S Mayberg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Single letter coloring and spatial cuing eliminates a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Laurie A Manwell; Martha Anne Roberts; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

4.  The relationship between Stroop interference and facilitation effects: statistical artifacts, baselines, and a reassessment.

Authors:  Tracy L Brown
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Single-letter coloring and spatial cuing do not eliminate or reduce a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; Valentin Flaudias; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-12

6.  The electrophysiological dynamics of interference during the Stroop task.

Authors:  Simon Hanslmayr; Bernhard Pastötter; Karl-Heinz Bäuml; Sieglinde Gruber; Maria Wimber; Wolfgang Klimesch
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Social priming of dyslexia and reduction of the Stroop effect: what component of the Stroop effect is actually reduced?

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-12-31

8.  The stroop effect and the myth of automaticity.

Authors:  D Besner; J A Stolz; C Boutilier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

9.  Priming and backward influences in the human brain: processing interactions during the stroop interference effect.

Authors:  L G Appelbaum; K L Meyerhoff; M G Woldorff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Differential effects of viewing positions on standard versus semantic Stroop interference.

Authors:  Ludovic Ferrand; Maria Augustinova
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04
View more
  10 in total

1.  Is semantic activation from print capacity limited? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.

Authors:  Derek Besner; Michael Reynolds
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

2.  The semantic Stroop effect: An ex-Gaussian analysis.

Authors:  Darcy White; Evan F Risko; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

3.  Some further clarifications on age-related differences in Stroop interference.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; David Clarys; Nicolas Spatola; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04

Review 4.  The loci of Stroop effects: a critical review of methods and evidence for levels of processing contributing to color-word Stroop effects and the implications for the loci of attentional selection.

Authors:  Benjamin A Parris; Nabil Hasshim; Michael Wadsley; Maria Augustinova; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-08-13

5.  Best not to bet on the horserace: A comment on Forrin and MacLeod (2017) and a relevant stimulus-response compatibility view of colour-word contingency learning asymmetries.

Authors:  James R Schmidt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-02

6.  EEG neural oscillatory dynamics reveal semantic and response conflict at difference levels of conflict awareness.

Authors:  Jun Jiang; Qinglin Zhang; Simon Van Gaal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Automaticity revisited: when print doesn't activate semantics.

Authors:  Elsa M Labuschagne; Derek Besner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-10

8.  Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines.

Authors:  Eric Lorentz; Tessa McKibben; Chelsea Ekstrand; Layla Gould; Kathryn Anton; Ron Borowsky
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-17

9.  The Loci of Stroop Interference and Facilitation Effects With Manual and Vocal Responses.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; Benjamin A Parris; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-08-19

10.  The effect of high-frequency rTMS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on the resolution of response, semantic and task conflict in the colour-word Stroop task.

Authors:  Benjamin A Parris; Michael G Wadsley; Gizem Arabaci; Nabil Hasshim; Maria Augustinova; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.270

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.