Literature DB >> 12516527

Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: testing the limits of involuntary word processing.

Tracy L Brown1, Kelly Joneleit, Cathy S Robinson, Carli Rose Brown.   

Abstract

We investigated the parameters of involuntary word reading in the Stroop task in 7 experiments. Experiments 1-4 varied response modality and the presence of congruent word trials in a test of the claim that presenting a Stroop color word with only one letter in the target color eliminates the Stroop effect. Experiments 5 and 6 addressed the roles of spatial attention and orthographic processing as possible mechanisms behind the reduction of Stroop effects with the single-letter format. Experiment 7 investigated the limits of involuntary reading under optimal conditions for selective processing of rectangular color patch targets. We found that the single-letter format reduced but never eliminated Stroop effects, spatial attention but not orthographic processing plays a role in the effect of the single-letter format, and word reading is not completely prevented even with austere presentation conditions. We conclude with a defense of the involuntariness criterion for automaticity in the Stroop task, particularly when word reading is viewed in the context of a skilled performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12516527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychol        ISSN: 0002-9556


  12 in total

1.  The Stroop effect and single letter coloring: what replicates and what doesn't?

Authors:  D Besner; J A Stolz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

2.  Single letter coloring and spatial cuing eliminates a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Laurie A Manwell; Martha Anne Roberts; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

3.  Suggestion does not de-automatize word reading: evidence from the semantically based Stroop task.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

4.  Single-letter coloring and spatial cuing do not eliminate or reduce a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; Valentin Flaudias; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-12

5.  The role of response mechanisms in determining reaction time performance: Piéron's law revisited.

Authors:  Tom Stafford; Kevin N Gurney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

6.  The Role of Visual Stimuli in Cross-Modal Stroop Interference.

Authors:  Danielle A Lutfi-Proctor; Emily M Elliott; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Psych J       Date:  2014-03-01

7.  Does modulation of selective attention to features reflect enhancement or suppression of neural activity?

Authors:  Kirk R Daffner; Tatyana Y Zhuravleva; Xue Sun; Elise C Tarbi; Anna E Haring; Dorene M Rentz; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  Dividing attention influences contextual facilitation and revision during language comprehension.

Authors:  Ryan J Hubbard; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.610

9.  Differential effects of viewing positions on standard versus semantic Stroop interference.

Authors:  Ludovic Ferrand; Maria Augustinova
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

10.  Automaticity of lexical access in deaf and hearing bilinguals: Cross-linguistic evidence from the color Stroop task across five languages.

Authors:  Rain G Bosworth; Eli M Binder; Sarah C Tyler; Jill P Morford
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2021-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.