Literature DB >> 29672118

The semantic Stroop effect is controlled by endogenous attention.

Sachiko Kinoshita1, Luke Mills1, Dennis Norris2.   

Abstract

Using the oral and manual Stroop tasks we tested the claim that retrieval of meaning from a written word is automatic, in the sense that it cannot be controlled. The semantic interference effect (greater interference caused by color-related words than color-neutral words) was used as the index of semantic activation. To manipulate the level of attentional control over the task of reading, the proportion of nonreadable, neutral trials (a row of #s) was varied (75% vs. 25%). In all four experiments a high-neutral proportion magnified the interference caused by word distractors. With the color-associated words presented in incongruent color (e.g., LEMON in blue), the semantic Stroop effect was weak and did not interact with neutral proportion (Experiment 1 and 2). Experiment 3 and 4 used color names (e.g., GREEN) not in the response set, and here the semantic interference effect was more robust, and the effect was magnified in the high-neutral proportion condition. We take these results to argue that semantic retrieval is controlled by endogenous attention in the Stroop task. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29672118      PMCID: PMC6711761          DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  35 in total

1.  Naming the color of a word: is it responses or task sets that compete?

Authors:  S Monsell; T J Taylor; K Murphy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

2.  Context dependency in Stroop's paradigm: when are words treated as nonlinguistic objects?

Authors:  D Besner; J Stolz
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1999-12

Review 3.  On a variant of Stroop's paradigm: which cognitions press your buttons?

Authors:  M Brown; D Besner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-09

4.  The myth of ballistic processing: evidence from Stroop's paradigm.

Authors:  D Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

5.  Why do non-color words interfere with color naming?

Authors:  Jennifer S Burt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  A position-sensitive Stroop effect: further evidence for a left-to-right component in print-to-speech conversion.

Authors:  M Coltheart; A Woollams; S Kinoshita; C Perry
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

7.  DMDX: a windows display program with millisecond accuracy.

Authors:  Kenneth I Forster; Jonathan C Forster
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-02

8.  Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: modeling attentional control in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Ardi Roelofs
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  SEMANTIC POWER MEASURED THROUGH THE INTERFERENCE OF WORDS WITH COLOR-NAMING.

Authors:  G S KLEIN
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1964-12

10.  Single letter coloring and spatial cuing eliminates a semantic contribution to the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Laurie A Manwell; Martha Anne Roberts; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06
View more
  6 in total

1.  Neutral stimuli and pupillometric task conflict.

Authors:  Ronen Hershman; Yulia Levin; Joseph Tzelgov; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-03-13

Review 2.  How can caching explain automaticity?

Authors:  Nir Fresco; Joseph Tzelgov; Lior Shmuelof
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-10-12

Review 3.  The loci of Stroop effects: a critical review of methods and evidence for levels of processing contributing to color-word Stroop effects and the implications for the loci of attentional selection.

Authors:  Benjamin A Parris; Nabil Hasshim; Michael Wadsley; Maria Augustinova; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-08-13

4.  Different types of semantic interference, same lapses of attention: Evidence from Stroop tasks.

Authors:  Michele Scaltritti; Remo Job; Simone Sulpizio
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-01-17

5.  The Loci of Stroop Interference and Facilitation Effects With Manual and Vocal Responses.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; Benjamin A Parris; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-08-19

6.  Strategies that reduce Stroop interference.

Authors:  B Palfi; B A Parris; A F Collins; Z Dienes
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.963

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.